2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00380-019-01401-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myocardial T1 values in healthy volunteers measured with saturation method using adaptive recovery times for T1 mapping (SMART1Map) at 1.5 T and 3 T

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The precursor sequence to Smart1Map, MLLSR, had yielded much lower native T 1 values of 910 ± 93 msec in adults on a 1.5T scanner, most likely because it still used several acquisitions after each saturation pulse, thereby altering T 1 relaxation similarly to MOLLI. Using Smart1Map with only one acquisition per saturation pulse, however, adult normal myocardial native T 1 values have been reported as identical to our pediatric native T 1 values with a mean of 1193 msec at 1.5T or slightly higher with a mean of 1227 msec, which could be due to different patient selections …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…The precursor sequence to Smart1Map, MLLSR, had yielded much lower native T 1 values of 910 ± 93 msec in adults on a 1.5T scanner, most likely because it still used several acquisitions after each saturation pulse, thereby altering T 1 relaxation similarly to MOLLI. Using Smart1Map with only one acquisition per saturation pulse, however, adult normal myocardial native T 1 values have been reported as identical to our pediatric native T 1 values with a mean of 1193 msec at 1.5T or slightly higher with a mean of 1227 msec, which could be due to different patient selections …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…This study is also the first one published using the SMART 1 Map sequence for the assessment of T 1 mapping in patients. Matsumoto et al 21 described the reference range of native T 1 values using the SMART 1 Map sequence in 24 healthy volunteers. Similarly, Burkhardt et al 20 established paediatric normal native T 1 values using the SMART 1 Map sequence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The saturation recovery T1 mapping sequence used in this study, SMART1Map, measures the true T1 value and is less sensitive to imaging and physiologic parameters ( 11 , 14 , 15 ). As a result, SMART1Map native T1 values are longer than those obtained by using a modified Look-Locker inversion recovery sequence ( 10 , 14 16 ). The native T1 values in the control participants of this study, 1423 msec ± 70, are within the same range as those reported by Ferry et al ( 15 ), 1447 msec ± 45, who used the same single-point saturation recovery T1 mapping sequence at 3 T.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Non–contrast-enhanced CMR was performed with a 3.0-T combined PET/MR imager (GE Signa PET/MR Discovery 750 W; GE Healthcare) ( 3 ). Native T1 mapping was assessed by using a single, short-axis, mid-LV section with a single-point saturation recovery sequence (saturation method using adaptive recovery times for T1 mapping [SMART1Map; GE Healthcare]) ( 10 , 11 ). Parameters for T1 mapping were 3.1-msec repetition time, 1.0-msec echo time, 350 × 350–mm 2 field of view, 1.4 × 1.4–mm 2 in-plane spatial resolution, and 7-mm section thickness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%