2008
DOI: 10.1362/026725708x273966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myopia and choice: framing, screening and shopping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, conducting another hypothesis-driven, deductive research study may not be the most promising way to develop a theoretical model concerning the stimulus, in this case the brand strategy. Furthermore, as I discuss in my chapter on research design and philosophy of science (chapters 4 and 5), I very much agree with authors such as Morrell and Jayawardhena (2008), who argue that rather than guessing, experimenting and hypothesizing as to the effects of brands, marketing research should refocus to also include theorizing and research to build a new base for the overall advancement of the discipline.…”
Section: Contributionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Thus, conducting another hypothesis-driven, deductive research study may not be the most promising way to develop a theoretical model concerning the stimulus, in this case the brand strategy. Furthermore, as I discuss in my chapter on research design and philosophy of science (chapters 4 and 5), I very much agree with authors such as Morrell and Jayawardhena (2008), who argue that rather than guessing, experimenting and hypothesizing as to the effects of brands, marketing research should refocus to also include theorizing and research to build a new base for the overall advancement of the discipline.…”
Section: Contributionmentioning
confidence: 64%