2018
DOI: 10.1101/332684
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myosin-driven fragmentation of actin filaments triggers contraction of a disordered actin network

Abstract: The dynamic cytoskeletal network is responsible for cell shape changes and cell division. The actinbased motor protein myosin II drives the remodeling of a highly disordered actin-based network and enables the network to perform mechanical work such as contraction, migration and adhesion. Myosin II forms bipolar filaments that self-associate via their tail domains. Such myosin minifilaments generate both extensile and compressive forces that pull and push actin filaments, depending on the relative position of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, their individual contents only partially predicted traction-force magnitude and the production of high traction forces appeared to require both phospho-myosin and F-actin in an optimum ratio (Figure 4C). This is consistent with the complex functional roles of myosin pulling on actin filaments in generating intracellular force (Thoresen et al, 2011;Reymann et al, 2012;Stachowiak et al, 2012) and in crosslinking and disassembling actin filaments (Haviv et al, 2008;Wilson et al, 2010;Reymann et al, 2012;Stachowiak et al, 2014;Matsuda et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, their individual contents only partially predicted traction-force magnitude and the production of high traction forces appeared to require both phospho-myosin and F-actin in an optimum ratio (Figure 4C). This is consistent with the complex functional roles of myosin pulling on actin filaments in generating intracellular force (Thoresen et al, 2011;Reymann et al, 2012;Stachowiak et al, 2012) and in crosslinking and disassembling actin filaments (Haviv et al, 2008;Wilson et al, 2010;Reymann et al, 2012;Stachowiak et al, 2014;Matsuda et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The results reflect a complex interplay between actin, HMM, [ATP], [Ca 2+ ], and gelsolin. Myosin generates contractile, extensile, bending, and torsional forces ( 65 , 66 , 67 ) with shearing, buckling, and eventually severing of the actin filaments ( 25 ) even in the absence of actin-binding proteins such as cofilin and gelsolin. Myosin-driven actin filament fragmentation in the in vitro motility assay experiments occurs in the presence of nearly physiological (millimolar) concentrations of ATP ( 25 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). These effects can be accommodated by local effects of gelsolin at its binding site to the actin filament and does not necessarily rely on gelsolin induced long-range allosteric changes in filament structure as suggested previously [74,77]. However, the effects of gelsolin binding on the sliding velocity at different filament lengths are difficult to explain without such long-range changes along the actin filament, previously suggested based on spectroscopic [29,47] and electron microscopic [46,78] evidence.…”
Section: Overall Mechanistic Interpretations Of the Datamentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The results reflect a complex interplay between actin, HMM, [ATP], [Ca 2+ ] and gelsolin. Myosin generates contractile, extensile, bending and torsional forces [74][75][76] with shearing, buckling and eventually severing of the actin filaments [26] even in the absence of actin-binding proteins such as cofilin and gelsolin. Myosin-driven actin filament fragmentation in the in vitro motility assay experiments occurs in the presence of nearly physiological millimolar concentrations of ATP [26].…”
Section: Overall Mechanistic Interpretations Of the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%