Family Divisions and Inequalities in Modern Society 1989
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-09337-3_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myth and Reality in the Discovery and Representation of Childhood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was migration from the inner city to the suburbs as the dynamics of family life changed, with a focus on improved lifestyles for the nuclear family. Despite these changes, the children of the 1950s were still 'seen and not heard' because, in spite of changing attitudes to parenting, the boundary separating adulthood and childhood was firmly maintained (Sgritta and Saporita, 1989). Then it was believed that 'parents feared the Depression would return or the bomb would drop' yet 'children of the era still managed to grow up with a sense of confidence about their place in the world' (Carruthers, 1994).…”
Section: Historical Transformation Of the Family Society And The Urbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was migration from the inner city to the suburbs as the dynamics of family life changed, with a focus on improved lifestyles for the nuclear family. Despite these changes, the children of the 1950s were still 'seen and not heard' because, in spite of changing attitudes to parenting, the boundary separating adulthood and childhood was firmly maintained (Sgritta and Saporita, 1989). Then it was believed that 'parents feared the Depression would return or the bomb would drop' yet 'children of the era still managed to grow up with a sense of confidence about their place in the world' (Carruthers, 1994).…”
Section: Historical Transformation Of the Family Society And The Urbmentioning
confidence: 99%