1983
DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(83)90678-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N = 4 Yang-Mills theory on the light cone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
342
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 290 publications
(347 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
342
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The physical degrees of freedom in N = 8 supergravity are all described by a single superfield [21] (and its conjugate) with Grassmann variables θ m (m . .…”
Section: Quadratic Forms In N = 8 Supergravitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical degrees of freedom in N = 8 supergravity are all described by a single superfield [21] (and its conjugate) with Grassmann variables θ m (m . .…”
Section: Quadratic Forms In N = 8 Supergravitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea of determining the interacting Hamiltonian by requiring the closure of the symmetry algebra has proven extremely fruitful in the past [41][42][43][44]. In particular, the entire N = 4 SYM theory -for which the light-cone superspace formulation was first obtained in [23,45] can be derived from closure of the superconformal algebra [46]. The action describing lightcone superstring field theory in ten dimensions has also been derived to cubic order in this way in [47][48][49][50] and the full Lorentz symmetry of the theory up to cubic order was verified in [51].…”
Section: Jhep07(2018)135mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formulation of spacetime supersymmetric SFT by Green, Schwarz and Brink [47][48][49][50] also belongs to this class of models. In the other approach, one uses superfields depending on both θ andθ, and certain chirality constraints are imposed, as was done for N = 4 SYM in [45]. While the former choice has the advantage of being direct, in the latter, formulae for the charges and the power-counting procedure [70] are more transparent because fermionic coordinates enter in supercovariant combinations.…”
Section: Chiral Derivatives Supersymmetry and Level-matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible approach to imposing further constraints is to abandon manifest SO(8) invariance and decompose the coordinates into representations of a U (4) subgroup [46,47]. Thus θȧ is decomposed into θ α ,θ α which transform as a 4 and 4, respectively.…”
Section: Light-cone Super Yang-mills Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%