2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N addition undermines N supplied by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to native perennial grasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, no yield advantage was achieved with this high level of fertilization at ARL (Jach‐Smith and Jackson ), which would indicate that plants were not N limited at the ARL site. Plant aboveground biomass and total N content was reported in Jach‐Smith and Jackson (), where a yield gain was achieved only at KBS with the N addition treatments. N content increased with N application rate, but this is assumed to be N luxury consumption (an increase in plant N concentration that is not used for growth) since there was no yield gain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, no yield advantage was achieved with this high level of fertilization at ARL (Jach‐Smith and Jackson ), which would indicate that plants were not N limited at the ARL site. Plant aboveground biomass and total N content was reported in Jach‐Smith and Jackson (), where a yield gain was achieved only at KBS with the N addition treatments. N content increased with N application rate, but this is assumed to be N luxury consumption (an increase in plant N concentration that is not used for growth) since there was no yield gain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The ability of the mycorrhizal network to transfer N from the donor to recipient plant varies from 0-80% [69]. However, much elevated N-fertilization did not increase nutrient transfer and plant biomass because plants may face other limitations, like water, light or space, that limit their growth [70]. However, at severe N deficiency, the AM fungi might consume additional N sources for their own needs, and as a result, there is little or no N transfer to the plants [71].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is almost certainly an underestimate, because our mass balance calculation does not include N lost by leaching (approximately 2.7 kg N ha -1 yr -1 , [ 18 ]) or from denitrification. While it is possible that some of this N might be supplied through net mineralization of soil organic N stores, especially since switchgrass and other perennial grasses are adept at recovering N from soils through their association with mycorrhizal fungi [ 57 , 58 ], we have seen no evidence of soil N depletion at this site [ 18 , 59 ], consistent with long-term gains in soil organic matter commonly observed when cultivated soils are converted from annual to perennial vegetation (e.g., [ 60 , 61 ]). The total N deficit is equivalent to ~7% of the total soil N pool, which is within detection limits if soil organic matter were the sole source of the missing N [ 62 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%