2016
DOI: 10.1002/aic.15531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N‐doped porous carbons for CO2 capture: Rational choice of N‐containing polymer with high phenyl density as precursor

Abstract: in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) N-doped porous carbons (NPCs) are highly promising for CO 2 capture, but their preparation is severely hindered by two factors, namely, the high cost of N-containing polymer precursors and the low yield of carbon products. Here we report for the first time the fabrication of NPCs through the rational choice of the polymer NUT-4, with low cost and high phenyl density, as precursor. For the material NPC-600 obtained from carbonization at 6008C, the yield is as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the adsorption of CO 2 decreased while the activation temperature aggrandized to 550°C. It can be seen from Table that at atmospheric pressure, the adsorption amount of the adsorbent for CO 2 was 3.06‐5.63 mmol/g at 273 K, and the adsorption amount was 2.04‐3.51 mmol/g at 298 K. This value, 3.51 mmol/g, was below than those of lately published adsorbents prepared through KOH activation, while it was similar or higher than some typical biomass‐derived porous carbons, some MOFs, COFs, and ZIFs at 298 K under 1 bar. Comparison of different porous adsorbents has been summarized in Table S1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the adsorption of CO 2 decreased while the activation temperature aggrandized to 550°C. It can be seen from Table that at atmospheric pressure, the adsorption amount of the adsorbent for CO 2 was 3.06‐5.63 mmol/g at 273 K, and the adsorption amount was 2.04‐3.51 mmol/g at 298 K. This value, 3.51 mmol/g, was below than those of lately published adsorbents prepared through KOH activation, while it was similar or higher than some typical biomass‐derived porous carbons, some MOFs, COFs, and ZIFs at 298 K under 1 bar. Comparison of different porous adsorbents has been summarized in Table S1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…It was universality acknowledged that nitrogencontaining samples for CO 2 adsorption were regulated by porous structure and nitrogen content of adsorbents. 31,35 The relation between porous structure and CO 2 adsorption was plotted in Figure S1. The porous structure included S BET , V t , V m, and V n .…”
Section: Co 2 Adsorption Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 5 Therefore, it has a wide application scope in the fields of adsorption, energy, catalysis, environment and separation, and so forth. 6 9 The general strategy to prepare porous carbon materials with large surface areas and the abundant pore structure can be summarized thus: hard or soft templates are applied in the carbonization process of a nitrogen-containing precursor. 10 , 11 However, this method still faces challenges in some degree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an adsorbent to be used for postcombustion carbon capture, it must exhibit great stability, high CO 2 uptake at 1 bar above 40°C and reasonably reject N 2 adsorption to minimize the energy penalty of regeneration . Many materials have been examined for the carbon capture application including porous carbons, zeolites, polymers, and MOFs . Although some MOFs demonstrate superior performance in CO 2 uptake, including MgMOF‐74 with a CO 2 capacity of 8.61 mmol/g, these same MOFs lack water stability and N 2 rejection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%