2013
DOI: 10.1111/febs.12271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N‐terminal domain of Pyrococcus furiosus l‐asparaginase functions as a non‐specific, stable, molecular chaperone

Abstract: The enzyme L-asparaginase of Pyrococcus furiosus (PfA) functions as a dimer with each monomer consisting of distinct N-and C-terminal domains (NPfA and CPfA, respectively), connected by a linker. Here we present data to show that NPfA functions as a non-specific molecular chaperone. Independently expressed NPfA refolded spontaneously whereas CPfA formed insoluble aggregates. However, when mixed and refolded together, NPfA augmented CPfA to fold with~90% recovery. NPfA also protected a variety of substrate prot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S1 and Supplementary Table S1 1 ). This, together with our earlier finding that the N-terminal domain of PfA is actually involved in the overall folding of the protein (Tomar et al, 2013), led us to speculate that the linker of PfA may have a rather insignificant role. Thus, to evaluate whether the domains of PfA can function in isolation, or in a certain combination, without the Sequence and structural comparison of bacterial and archaeal l-asparaginases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…S1 and Supplementary Table S1 1 ). This, together with our earlier finding that the N-terminal domain of PfA is actually involved in the overall folding of the protein (Tomar et al, 2013), led us to speculate that the linker of PfA may have a rather insignificant role. Thus, to evaluate whether the domains of PfA can function in isolation, or in a certain combination, without the Sequence and structural comparison of bacterial and archaeal l-asparaginases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In addition, the thermodynamic parameters clearly placed NPfA as the more stable partner (Table 1). This information along with our previous finding that the N-domain acts as a folding assistance to the C-terminal domain made us to conclude that in the case of PfA the domains fold sequentially; N-domain folds first followed by the C-domain (Tomar et al 2013). 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis was carried out using primer 5′CTTATCCAGCCAGAAG ATTTTGTAGATCTTGCTGAAAC3′ and its complement, and primer 5′ACAGTAACAAAGCTCATGTTTATTCTAG GCCACACAA3′ and its complementary pair for obtaining W60F (N-terminal Trp mutant) and W301F (C-terminal Trp mutant), respectively. All the proteins were purified by standard Ni-NTA-affinity procedure explained elsewhere (Bansal et al 2012;Tomar et al 2013Tomar et al , 2014. Transformed E. coli cells (Rosetta DE3), grown by shaking at 37 °C in LB medium (HiMedia) containing 50 µg ml −1 kanamycin and 17 µg ml −1 chloramphenicol (Sigma), were induced with 1 mM IPTG (Sigma) (at A 600 of 0.6) and harvested 14 h post-induction by centrifugation, followed by sonication.…”
Section: Cloning Expression and Purification Of Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on various reports indicating isolated protein domains having internal chaperonin activities [48,49], attempts to fold the truncated MalZ in presence of the [50], it can also result in enhancement of function for the protein [51,52]. The Nterminal may play an active role in the catalytic activity as it has been reported in case for some amylases that N-terminal binds to starch or pullalan and may help in catalytic activity [53].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%