polymers have also emerged as potential candidates for organic thermoelectrics, [7,8] potentially delivering flexible, large-area, and low-cost energy generation or heatingcooling devices for appealing applications, e.g., wearable energy harvesting, that are currently not possible for traditional brittle and usually either toxic or rare inorganic crystalline thermoelectric materials. Thermoelectric materials are evaluated by the dimensionless figure of merit ZT = S 2 σT/κ, where S, σ, T and κ represent the Seebeck coefficient, electrical conductivity, absolute temperature and thermal conductivity, respectively. Most conjugated polymers are characterized with low κ values, intrinsically contributing to a high ZT. This point has been verified by recent extensive thermoelectric studies based on p-type conjugated polymers such as poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) with ZT > 0.25. [9,10] The performance of p-type and n-type thermoelectric materials should pair with each other ahead of any practical applications. However, n-type conjugated polymer-based thermoelectric devices are still far inferior to their p-type counterparts in terms of power factor (S 2 σ). [11,12] Therefore, the development of efficient The ORCID identification number(s) for the author(s) of this article can be found under