2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-7061(01)00110-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N2O and CH4 fluxes in potato fields: automated measurement, management effects and temporal variation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
70
2
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
9
70
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our cumulative emissions were slightly lower than mean data from papers on Mediterranean environment reported in the review of Aguilera et al (2013) on annual basis (700 g N-N2O ha -1 y -1 ). Flessa et al (2002) in a temperate climate reported cumulative N-N2O higher than our value, around 2 kg N-N2O ha -1 y -1 from lupine. The same author observed that cumulative emissions from lupine were lower than emissions from fertilized crops in the same area but highlighted that the ploughing of a clover field after the harvest had a negative effect on the growing period of the subsequent crop enhancing emissions (7-12 kg N-N2O ha -1 y -1 ), probably due to the mineralization of biologically N fixed residue and the increased microbial respiration.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…Our cumulative emissions were slightly lower than mean data from papers on Mediterranean environment reported in the review of Aguilera et al (2013) on annual basis (700 g N-N2O ha -1 y -1 ). Flessa et al (2002) in a temperate climate reported cumulative N-N2O higher than our value, around 2 kg N-N2O ha -1 y -1 from lupine. The same author observed that cumulative emissions from lupine were lower than emissions from fertilized crops in the same area but highlighted that the ploughing of a clover field after the harvest had a negative effect on the growing period of the subsequent crop enhancing emissions (7-12 kg N-N2O ha -1 y -1 ), probably due to the mineralization of biologically N fixed residue and the increased microbial respiration.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, the high N 2 O emissions at harvest may reflect increased carbon availability primarily associated with rewetting of soil after an extended dry period and possibly also due to increased carbon availability associated with root death at crop maturity. Previous studies have also reported increased N 2 O emissions at times when soil carbon availability would be expected to increase including after re-wetting of dry soil (Ruser et al 2006), following harvest of soybeans , after topkill of potatoes (Flessa et al 2002) and after incorporation of crop residues (Baggs et al 2000). These findings highlight the importance of both soil …”
Section: Zebarth Et Al * Nitrous Oxide Emissions From Barley 201mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…(1 (Ruser et al 1998;Smith et al 1998a,b;Conen et al 2000;Flessa et al 2002). Peak N 2 O emissions and denitrification events were triggered by rainfall events supporting denitrification as the primary source for N 2 O in this system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%