2020
DOI: 10.3390/cells9020360
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N6-Adenosine Methylation in RNA and a Reduced m3G/TMG Level in Non-Coding RNAs Appear at Microirradiation-Induced DNA Lesions

Abstract: The DNA damage response is mediated by both DNA repair proteins and epigenetic markers. Here, we observe that N6-methyladenosine (m6A), a mark of the epitranscriptome, was common in RNAs accumulated at UV-damaged chromatin; however, inhibitors of RNA polymerases I and II did not affect the m6A RNA level at the irradiated genomic regions. After genome injury, m6A RNAs either diffused to the damaged chromatin or appeared at the lesions enzymatically. DNA damage did not change the levels of METTL3 and METTL14 met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…METTL16, a U6 snRNA methyltransferase, was also recruited to DNA damage sites at a later time point (20-30 min post-UV) and was found to methylate small nuclear and nucleolar RNAs that were also recruited to DNA damage sites upon UV radiation [58]. m 6 A was only recruited to DNA damage lesions only in the presence of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs), which form in response to UV exposure [58]. Furthermore, in response to UV, m 6 A RNA modifications may utilize the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway rather than nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ), as knockout of two NHEJ-specific enzymes, SUV391H/H2, had no effect on m 6 A recruitment [58].…”
Section: Writersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…METTL16, a U6 snRNA methyltransferase, was also recruited to DNA damage sites at a later time point (20-30 min post-UV) and was found to methylate small nuclear and nucleolar RNAs that were also recruited to DNA damage sites upon UV radiation [58]. m 6 A was only recruited to DNA damage lesions only in the presence of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs), which form in response to UV exposure [58]. Furthermore, in response to UV, m 6 A RNA modifications may utilize the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway rather than nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ), as knockout of two NHEJ-specific enzymes, SUV391H/H2, had no effect on m 6 A recruitment [58].…”
Section: Writersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colocalization of Pol κ with m6A to sites with a high content of cyclobutene pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) corroborate that m6A RNAs have a regulatory role in the NER pathway. Svobodová et al [108] found that m6A RNAs are diffuse to damaged DNA, but a new participant, METTL16, accumulated 20-30 min after induced damage in a subset of irradiated cells. This response was specific to CPDs, as the authors observed that m6A RNAs' accumulation pattern was specific to repair of CPDs' sites, which do not accumulate in other lesions, such as NHEJ.…”
Section: Genome Damage Repair Via M6a Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RNA m 6 A-modification accumulates rapidly at UV laser microirradiated sites, colocalising with the m 6 A writer METTL3–METTL14 complex. More generally, UVC induced m 6 A in a variety of transcripts, indicating a possible dual role of m 6 A in the UV DDR, both at the site of the damage and more globally within the cell [ 133 , 134 ]. m 6 A was found to be required for the recruitment of downstream repair factors, such as Polymerase κ (Pol κ), although DSB repair factors such as BRCA1 and 53BP1 were not dependent on the m 6 A writer METTL3 for recruitment to damage [ 133 ].…”
Section: Looking Ahead: Rna Modifications and The Ddr A Role For Rnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, this m 1 A RNA modification can be reversed by ALKBH3, an enzyme with a known role in DNA repair [ 140 ]. While m 1 A has not been shown to be recruited to UV-microirradiation in the same manner as m 6 A [ 134 ] further studies may shed light on a potential role of in the DDR. However, it is important to note that there has been controversy regarding the m 1 A antibody, suggesting m 1 A peaks identified in 5′UTRs are likely the result of antibody cross-reactivity with the m 7 G-cap of RNA [ 143 ].…”
Section: Looking Ahead: Rna Modifications and The Ddr A Role For Rnamentioning
confidence: 99%