1994
DOI: 10.1080/01062301.1994.10592318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Nachträglichkeit’: The intermediary of an unassimilated impression and experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The role that N/AC plays in the retroactive constitution of temporal experience and in traumatic psychopathology, which is also crucial in clinical settings, has been further interpreted in the scientific literature explicitly in relation to meaning-making processes, which seem to be crucially involved in the constitution of memory traces grounding a person’s self-narrative. Albeit not explicitly speaking of meaning-making processes, Künstlicher (1994) seemed to anticipate more modern views of the function of N/AC as a sense-making mechanism, and argued that N/AC operates as a “screen” against the world, since a person’s self-narrative changes through “translations” and “reinterpretations.” As expressed by Goldin (2016), personal narratives are in their essence forms of reorganization and translation of experience in the form of N/AC. House (2017) thought of the human psyche itself as a constant process of creation of meaning, where “translation” seems crucial to understanding the temporal bidirectionality of N/AC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The role that N/AC plays in the retroactive constitution of temporal experience and in traumatic psychopathology, which is also crucial in clinical settings, has been further interpreted in the scientific literature explicitly in relation to meaning-making processes, which seem to be crucially involved in the constitution of memory traces grounding a person’s self-narrative. Albeit not explicitly speaking of meaning-making processes, Künstlicher (1994) seemed to anticipate more modern views of the function of N/AC as a sense-making mechanism, and argued that N/AC operates as a “screen” against the world, since a person’s self-narrative changes through “translations” and “reinterpretations.” As expressed by Goldin (2016), personal narratives are in their essence forms of reorganization and translation of experience in the form of N/AC. House (2017) thought of the human psyche itself as a constant process of creation of meaning, where “translation” seems crucial to understanding the temporal bidirectionality of N/AC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The line of research pertaining to the last domain is mainly represented by Faimberg's (1997Faimberg's ( , 2005Faimberg's ( , 2007Faimberg's ( , 2013 contributions, which were found to be the most substantial in recent decades, among other authors (Escobar et al, 2017;Harris, 2021;Harris et al, 2021;House, 2017;House & Slotnick, 2015;Künstlicher, 1994;Margulies, 2018;Stern, 2017). Accordingly, retranscriptions in the form of N/AC meaning-making processes are never-ending mechanisms associated with the "otherness" within us, which continuously exerts a pressure on the signification of experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We should also consider Freud's (1918/1955) concept of Nachträglichkeit . Künstlicher (1994) describes in his illustration of Nachträglichkeit how Freud made this concept have at least two meanings: how earlier experiences get their meaning in retrospect through actual fantasies in the psychoanalytic situation, and how the original traumas are transferred into the future as a pathological process, what Freud called repetition compulsion . Karlsson (2000), in discussing the existential and hermeneutical meaning of Nachträglichkeit , points out that “the existence of 'nachträglichkeit' illustrates this unfinished character of experiences” (p. 20).…”
Section: “But You Are a Professional”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without a suf ciently intact intentionality, in terms of continuity, coherence and wholeness, there is no chance for the pleasure principle to emerge and no wishing is possible. When consciousness contains large gaps, it may be the task of the psychoanalyst to af rm a real event and to function as a ' rst witness' (Künstlicher, 1994). Here we are dealing with a pure reconstruction, as opposed to the reconstruction that emanates from unconscious material (ruled by primary processes and the pleasure principle), which rather should be called a constructed reconstruction (cf.…”
Section: Clinical Re Ections and Illustrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%