2014
DOI: 10.1166/jbn.2014.1941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nano-Biomimetics for Nano/Micro Tissue Regeneration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Binding between the polymerized Sil layer and fibrin/alginate layer seemed uniform for both the composites. As previously reported, one of the main features of the fibrin/alginate dermal scaffold Smart Matrix is the presence of both nanofibers and nanopores, thus resembling the natural extracellular matrix (ECM) which cells are exposed to in vivo . SEM suggests that these nanofeatures are still present in the two‐component hybrid scaffolds (Figure , images at 5000×, far right column).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Binding between the polymerized Sil layer and fibrin/alginate layer seemed uniform for both the composites. As previously reported, one of the main features of the fibrin/alginate dermal scaffold Smart Matrix is the presence of both nanofibers and nanopores, thus resembling the natural extracellular matrix (ECM) which cells are exposed to in vivo . SEM suggests that these nanofeatures are still present in the two‐component hybrid scaffolds (Figure , images at 5000×, far right column).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…As previously reported, one of the main features of the fibrin/alginate dermal scaffold Smart Matrix is the presence of both nanofibers and nanopores, thus resembling the natural extracellular matrix (ECM) which cells are exposed to in vivo. [29,33] SEM suggests that these nanofeatures are still present in the two-component hybrid scaffolds (Figure 2 Confocal microscopy showed no qualitative differences in terms of surface topography between the fibrin/alginate scaffold and the two-component hybrid ones (Figure 3). Confocal microscopy images also showed consistent results in terms of structure for the three scaffolds: all scaffolds presented open and interconnected porous structures with micropores in a range of sizes.…”
Section: Structural Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The development of nanostructured materials has recently assumed great importance in cellular studies and regenerative medicine, since these materials may represent a smart solution to produce devices associated with significant human applications, manufactured at high production rates and volumes (for recent reviews, see e.g. Singh et al, ; Hopley et al , ; Hofmann, ; Fraczek‐Szczypta, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ideal objective would be to restore the tendon to its pre-injured state. This is the goal of tissue engineering (TE) [15][16][17][18][19] of tendons, a growing field which aims to combine scaffolds, cells and growth factors to form constructs that will aid regeneration of the native tendon. This review will focus on the application of tissue engineering strategies for tendon regeneration, including the selection and design of scaffold materials, cell sources and growth factors that may overcome limitations of current methods used for tendon reconstruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%