2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nano-scale friction of polystyrene in air and in vacuum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sliding (dynamic) friction data was measured in volts and is reported as half of the difference between trace and retrace signals for the central 800 nm region of each scan line (thus excluding any scanning tip trace–retrace turnaround contributions attributable to static friction). This data is directly proportional to friction , and was not converted to absolute friction force values because of the dependency upon which method is adopted to measure the lateral spring constant. , Even if the method used to determine the lateral spring constant was completely reliable, friction coefficients are still very dependent on the measurement system employed and the various parameters involved (scan rate, contact area, counter surface, etc). Hence, for the purpose of the present study, the tribological experiments were undertaken by utilizing an internal reference, namely, the ATRP-grafted poly(NaStS) brushes tethered to a pulsed-plasma-deposited poly(VBC) layer. The 3 Hz scan rate of the AFM gives rise to a tip movement speed of 6 μm s –1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sliding (dynamic) friction data was measured in volts and is reported as half of the difference between trace and retrace signals for the central 800 nm region of each scan line (thus excluding any scanning tip trace–retrace turnaround contributions attributable to static friction). This data is directly proportional to friction , and was not converted to absolute friction force values because of the dependency upon which method is adopted to measure the lateral spring constant. , Even if the method used to determine the lateral spring constant was completely reliable, friction coefficients are still very dependent on the measurement system employed and the various parameters involved (scan rate, contact area, counter surface, etc). Hence, for the purpose of the present study, the tribological experiments were undertaken by utilizing an internal reference, namely, the ATRP-grafted poly(NaStS) brushes tethered to a pulsed-plasma-deposited poly(VBC) layer. The 3 Hz scan rate of the AFM gives rise to a tip movement speed of 6 μm s –1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flow within the tube was approximated under the assumption of no axial flow, no azimuthal change, and no radial flow. On the basis of these assumptions, a simplified version of the Navier-Stokes equation could be written in cylindrical coordinates, where u, azimuthal velocity; η, dynamic viscosity; ρ, fluid density; r, radius; and p, pressure-see Equations (10) and (11). This approach was already used by Fuchs and Drahm [31] for cylindrical geometries.…”
Section: Resonator Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sensors are robust, have no moving parts, and are, therefore, suited to real-time measurements. Using sensors based on resonance, various materials can be investigated for different purposes, such as studying the viscoelastic behavior of polymers, determining fluid density and viscosity [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8], characterizing the mechanical properties of polymer membranes and thin films [9][10][11][12][13][14], and detecting biomolecule or nanoparticle masses [15][16][17][18][19][20]. Sensors using torsional vibration are a subgroup of mechanical resonators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the nano-level, friction is largely influenced by air humidity [14][15][16] as well as the water absorbed by the contact interface surfaces due to capillary action [17]. LFM determination of the impact of humidity on the friction at the nano-level, under the atmospheric pressure and vacuum, was reported in Bistac et al [18]. In this case, the friction in vacuum decreases with the increase of sliding speed, while, under normal pressure conditions, the friction ramps up with the sliding speed, due to absorbed water at the contact interface layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%