“…Therefore, based on the sharp line shape profile profile (Mode C), both the Cu 2−x S@Au CSNDs with a gap of 4 nm, a shell thickness of 2 nm, an FoM of 7.360 and an RIS of 541.082 nm per RIU and the Cu 2−x S@Au CSNDs with a gap of 2 nm, a shell thickness of 2 nm, an FoM of 5.932 and an RIU of 591.966 nm per RIU appear to be optimal, which means that the Cu 2−x S@Au CSNDs exhibit greater tunability in the RIU by changing the gap and t according to the experimental requirements. Compared with other nanoparticle sensors, such as Ag core/Au shell nanospheres (109.5 nm RIU −1 ) [11], dielectric encapsulation Ag nanospheres cluster sensors (193 nm RIU −1 ) [25], Ag nanosphere cluster sensors (200 nm RIU −1 ) [48], dielectric core/metal shell nanoparticles dimer sensor (220 nm RIU −1 ) [24], hollow gold nanoshells (400 nm RIU −1 ) [26], hollow overlapping gold shells (474 nm RIU −1 ) [11] and gold nanoparticles trimer (546 nm RIU −1 , FoM ∼ 3.2) [30], the RIS and FoM sensitivity of the Cu 2−x S@Au CSNDs are larger than those of other nanoparticle dimers. The reason is that the electric charge intensity is enhance with the decreasing the gap and shell thickness t, resulting in the increased multipole moments for the Cu 2−x S@Au dimer, as shown in figures 5 and 6.…”