2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.11.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanobubble boundary layer thickness quantified by solvent relaxation NMR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the large microbubbles, the critical film thickness by bubble rupture was reported to be approximately 30 nm in 10 µm sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and 0.3 M NaCl solution 48 . However, the measurement results of the boundary layer thickness around the bubble by IFA differ from the above-mentioned reference 47 , 48 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the large microbubbles, the critical film thickness by bubble rupture was reported to be approximately 30 nm in 10 µm sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and 0.3 M NaCl solution 48 . However, the measurement results of the boundary layer thickness around the bubble by IFA differ from the above-mentioned reference 47 , 48 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In this study, the hydrodynamic diameter measured by IFA and boundary layer thickness determined with NTA were measured for the first time. On the other hand, with the help of DLS and solvent relaxation NMR measurement results, the boundary layer thickness of nanobubbles is calculated to be about 40 nm 47 . In the large microbubbles, the critical film thickness by bubble rupture was reported to be approximately 30 nm in 10 µm sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and 0.3 M NaCl solution 48 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hirai et al (2019) studied the structure of ultrafine bubbles using small-and wide-angle X-ray scattering and explained that an ultrafine bubble is surrounded by a diffusive boundary, and the electron density differs between the diffusive boundary and the bulk solution. Zhang R. et al (2022a) quantified the boundary layer thickness of the ultrafine bubbles using solvent relaxation of nuclear magnetic resonance. For effective gas diameters of 243.5, 358.5, and 412.8 nm, the determined boundary layer thicknesses were 41.5, 44.8, and 35.9 nm, and the ratios of the boundary layer thickness to the effective gas diameter were 0.17, 0.125, and 0.087, respectively.…”
Section: Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxometry is also proving to be an invaluable technique to study dispersion surface properties, or otherwise applied industrially to analyze pore structures and wettability in reservoir rocks for enhanced oil recovery, where the use of very low-field, desktop instruments has provided an avenue for inline or at-line analysis. Originally, the technique was largely developed for rapid surface area measurements of nanoparticle dispersions , but has advanced extensively to incorporate analyses of a number of colloidal surface chemistry effects and even nanobubbles . For example, recent studies have utilized the technique to evaluate the exfoliation or surface chemistry of graphene oxide and other related carbon materials as well as the stability and aggregation of various mineral dispersions, and influence of ultrasonication on dispersion, where it has also pointedly been used to quantify organic and inorganic dispersants. It has also been used to characterize different TiO 2 nanocrystal polymorphs .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%