2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30811-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanobubble size distribution measurement by interactive force apparatus under an electric field

Abstract: Nanobubbles have been applied in many fields, such as environmental cleaning, material production, agriculture, and medicine. However, the measured nanobubble sizes differed among the measurement methods, such as dynamic light scattering, particle trajectory, and resonance mass methods. Additionally, the measurement methods were limited with respect to the bubble concentration, refractive index of liquid, and liquid color. Here, a novel interactive force measurement method for bulk nanobubble size measurement … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(A consistently smaller density of 1.0 × 10 8 /mL and an average diameter of 130 nm with an oscillatory structure that differed from run to run was obtained from the NanoSight Instrument.) In a recent paper comparing methods used to determine nanobubble size distributions, the oscillatory structure is not seen when the dynamic light scattering (DLS) or interactive force analysis (IFA) methods are used . It seems to be an artifact of intense diffraction patterns produced by some of the nanobubbles flowing through the NanoSight field of view.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(A consistently smaller density of 1.0 × 10 8 /mL and an average diameter of 130 nm with an oscillatory structure that differed from run to run was obtained from the NanoSight Instrument.) In a recent paper comparing methods used to determine nanobubble size distributions, the oscillatory structure is not seen when the dynamic light scattering (DLS) or interactive force analysis (IFA) methods are used . It seems to be an artifact of intense diffraction patterns produced by some of the nanobubbles flowing through the NanoSight field of view.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X-ray diffraction patterns in Figure show that the precipitates are largely composed of calcium carbonates, with a minor amount of halite (H). Aragonite (A) is produced by ultrasound-induced precipitation , or by boiling, whereas slow precipitation by heating to 80 °C produces calcite (C), the more stable polymorph. A minor amount of calcite (6%) is found in the 40 min sonicated aragonite and minor amounts of aragonite and halite in the 80 °C heated calcite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, this controversy gradually subsided as the first images of nanoscale bubbles were obtained by atomic force microscopy in 2000, and subsequent mounting evidence solidified the existence and potential stability of NBs. Since then, studies on their generation strategies (e.g., hydrodynamic, acoustic, electrochemical, and mechanical agitation), physicochemical properties (e.g., size distribution, ζ-potential, and stability), and underlying mechanisms to elucidate these properties have progressed rapidly. Although a conclusive statement on the stabilization mechanism of NBs is still lacking in theory, their intriguing and unique physicochemical properties, such as their high surface area per unit volume, ultra-long lifetime in water, high mass transfer efficiency, and ability to produce highly reactive radicals, have attracted widespread interest in many fields, including wastewater treatment and purification, surface cleaning, plant and animal growth promotion, and medical examination and treatment, and have shown the potential to replace or enhance of the current treatment processes. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%