2000
DOI: 10.1557/proc-661-kk4.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanofiller-Polymer Interactions At and Above the Glass Transition Temperature

Abstract: Rheological data are reported for a series of fumed silica filled PVAc samples, using fillers of different specific surface areas and surface treatments. Data at the glass transition temperature and 45 C above Tg are presented. The addition of filler systematically increases Tg, and all samples obey time-temperature superposition. However, temperature normalized and frequency normalized plots of loss modulus indicate that there is no change in the dispersion of the glass transition, with the only exception bei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While relatively small due to the high stiffness of the Dynastat, corrections were still made for the machine compliance. This correction was minimal for the above T g data reported here but significant for the glass transition data obtained using a symmetric simple-shear sandwich and reported elsewhere …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 46%
“…While relatively small due to the high stiffness of the Dynastat, corrections were still made for the machine compliance. This correction was minimal for the above T g data reported here but significant for the glass transition data obtained using a symmetric simple-shear sandwich and reported elsewhere …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 46%
“…During the past few years, intensive discussion on the origin of the reinforcement in polymer nanocomposites has been hold. As it has been shown by Sternstein et al1–3 and Kalfus et al,4, 5 rubbery nanocomposite reinforcement depends considerably on the external conditions (e.g., temperature, dynamic strain amplitude) and composite structure—the polymer matrix nature, filler surface treatment and mainly the filler‐matrix contact area. Direct filler agglomeration and filler particle shape seemed to be less important representing only a second‐order contribution to the viscoelastic response of a nanocomposite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…On the basis of the theoretical analyses as well as experimental data published in literature, there is sufficient background for more general understanding of the reinforcing mechanism in polymer nanocomposites 1–16. In this contribution we compared results from molecular model utilizing reptation concept with relaxation data obtained from modulus recovery measurements following the Payne effect published previously 5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, serious attempts to investigate the reinforcing mechanism in polymer nanocomposites have been predominantly restricted to systems with amorphous matrices [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. In these matrices above their T g , the chains can undergo segmental immobilization induced even by weak interactions on the large filler-matrix internal interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%