2017
DOI: 10.1002/lpor.201700212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanolasers Enabled by Metallic Nanoparticles: From Spasers to Random Lasers

Abstract: Owing to exotic optical responses, metallic nanoparticles and nanostructures are finding broad applications in laser science, leading to numerous design variations of plasmonic nanolasers. Nowadays, two of the most intriguing plasmonic nanolasing devices are spasers and random lasers. While a spaser is based on a single metallic nanoparticle resonator with the optical feedback provided by the localized surface plasmon resonance, the operation of a random laser relies on multiple light scattering within randoml… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
(257 reference statements)
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to our observations and the reports by Frolov et al and Yu et al supporting collection area dependence of stimulated emission spectra, we propose that the observed multimode emission behavior depends on the collection area, and occurs when a few localized arrangements of AgNPs with interparticle plasmonic coupling modes are sampled. In fact, spasing arising from interparticle plasmonic coupling is consistent with that described for a “random spaser,” as proposed by Wang et al in their recent review article …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to our observations and the reports by Frolov et al and Yu et al supporting collection area dependence of stimulated emission spectra, we propose that the observed multimode emission behavior depends on the collection area, and occurs when a few localized arrangements of AgNPs with interparticle plasmonic coupling modes are sampled. In fact, spasing arising from interparticle plasmonic coupling is consistent with that described for a “random spaser,” as proposed by Wang et al in their recent review article …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Single mode emission spectra have been reported in both cases; however, in some MNP‐RLs multimode emission is also observed . Both use relatively dense ensembles of MNPs; however, the emission mechanisms are attributed to scattering from multiple MNPs in RLs and to the LSPRs of individual NPs in MNP‐lasing‐spasers . A distinction between MNP‐RLs and MNP‐lasing‐spasers was made by Meng et al, where they showed that the stimulated emission redshifted with increasing dielectric constant of the surrounding gain medium, which is indicative of LSPR behavior .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a possibility to use a single metal nanoparticle or other quasi 0D structures as a lasing nanocavity with 3D confinement, if the confinement is compromised to a certain extent. Since the first theoretical model of plasmonic nanolaser, great efforts have been made to pursue the 3D‐confined LSPR nanolaser . Although lasing emission from active nanostructure ensemble composing of an Au nanosphere core and a layer of dye molecules shell was observed, but lasing from a single nanoparticle had not been confirmed, and the lasing cavity is more likely originated from other mechanisms (e.g., random lasing) than the single‐particle LSPR feedback.…”
Section: Experimental Demonstrations Of the Plasmonic Nanolasersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2003, Bergman and Stockman proposed the concept of surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation (SPASER) with a plasmonic feedback cavity, whose size is possibly to be reduced far below the diffraction limit of light in vacuum . Later in 2009, plasmonic lasers with mode sizes well below the diffraction limit was reported experimentally, which soon attracted broad attentions from nanophotonics, plasmonics to laser communities . Compared to a conventional “photonic nanolaser” relying on a dielectric cavity with feature size (cavity or mode size) equal to or larger than λ/2 n , a plasmonic nanolaser offers an opportunity to reduce the mode size smaller than λ/20, whereas n is usually smaller than 5 for dielectrics at low‐absorption frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon can therefore be of use in many different fields of science starting from sensing to photocatalysis to on‐chip optical communications . Plasmonics has been successfully used to demonstrate such devices as optical tweezers, nanolasers, on‐chip modulators, solar water splitting electrochemical cells, lenses, holograms, heat‐assisted magnetic recording, etc. Such a broad range of devices can only be built on a backbone of in‐depth and thorough study of a material platform for plasmonics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%