2014
DOI: 10.1039/c4ta01005a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoparticle-aggregated CuO nanoellipsoids for high-performance non-enzymatic glucose detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen, the CuO electrode almost exhibits no catalytic activity toward electro-oxidation of glucose when the applied potential is below 0.1 V. The anodic current at the CuO electrode increases with the increase of the applied potential in the range of 0.20 .4 V, and decreases with further increase of the applied potential because that high potential could promote fast oxidation of glucose, which would lead to accumulation of intermediates and reaction products on the electrode surface and block of the catalytic active sites, and thus further oxidation of glucose being hindered [15]. This fact indicates the CuO electrode exhibits the highest electrocatalytic activity toward glucose oxidation at an applied potential of 0.4 V, which is lower than the detection potentials needed by most of other CuO-based enzymeless glucose sensors [22,24,28,29,33].…”
Section: Nonenzymatic Glucose Sensing Performancementioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be seen, the CuO electrode almost exhibits no catalytic activity toward electro-oxidation of glucose when the applied potential is below 0.1 V. The anodic current at the CuO electrode increases with the increase of the applied potential in the range of 0.20 .4 V, and decreases with further increase of the applied potential because that high potential could promote fast oxidation of glucose, which would lead to accumulation of intermediates and reaction products on the electrode surface and block of the catalytic active sites, and thus further oxidation of glucose being hindered [15]. This fact indicates the CuO electrode exhibits the highest electrocatalytic activity toward glucose oxidation at an applied potential of 0.4 V, which is lower than the detection potentials needed by most of other CuO-based enzymeless glucose sensors [22,24,28,29,33].…”
Section: Nonenzymatic Glucose Sensing Performancementioning
confidence: 89%
“…On the other hand, the introduced components in the CuO-based nanocomposites will inevitably cause production cost increasing. In addition, many micro-/ nanostructured CuO-based nonenzymatic sensors work only at a high applied potential (near to or higher than 0.6 V) [22,24,28,29], which can induce amperometric interference from the oxidation of many endogenous reducing substances such as AA, UA and dopamine (DA) in the biological fluids. Even so, the sensitivity for most of the current CuO-based enzymeless sensors is only of a magnitude of mA mM À1 cm…”
Section: à2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13] Nanostructured metal 4 oxides have been found to possess interesting nano-morphology, multiple oxidation states, and good biological compatibility. 6,14,15 These unique properties of nanosized metal oxides could alleviate the problems of expensive enzymatic glucose sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1,3,11,14,24,[35][37] Figure S8presents the current-time curve of the Cu foam-supported Cu 2 O electrode towards 10 nM glucose, displaying an obvious step-like increase of current due to the glucose addition.Figure 6e displays the typical amperometric detection of the Cu foam-supported Cu 2 O electrode at 0.55 V vs. Ag/AgCl owing to the stepwise addition of glucose from 0.1 µM to 1 mM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Accordingly, a number of metals, metal oxides, and metal alloys, such as Ni, CuO, Co 3 O 4 , PbO 2 , and Ir-Zn, for the fabrication of the non-enzymatic glucose sensors are reported [12][13][14][15]. CuO as a p-type semiconductor has been widely investigated for the non-enzymatic glucose sensing due to its good electrocatalytic activity [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%