2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.03.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoparticles against resistant Pseudomonas spp.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The minimum bactericidal concentration is identified by determining the lowest concentration of antibacterial agent that reduces the viability of the initial bacterial inoculum by ≥99.9%. The MBC is complementary to MIC; whereas, MIC test demonstrates the lowest level of antimicrobial agent that inhibits growth, MBC test demonstrates the lowest level of antimicrobial agent that results in microbial death 49,50 . The fractional inhibitory concentration was used for combination of materials based on the following equation:where A refers to TiO 2 nanoparticles and B refers to ZnO nanoparticles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum bactericidal concentration is identified by determining the lowest concentration of antibacterial agent that reduces the viability of the initial bacterial inoculum by ≥99.9%. The MBC is complementary to MIC; whereas, MIC test demonstrates the lowest level of antimicrobial agent that inhibits growth, MBC test demonstrates the lowest level of antimicrobial agent that results in microbial death 49,50 . The fractional inhibitory concentration was used for combination of materials based on the following equation:where A refers to TiO 2 nanoparticles and B refers to ZnO nanoparticles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Venegas et al . ). Small size of NPs can contribute to antimicrobial effects facilitating their penetration across bacterial membranes (Chatterjee et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%