“…Following the first report of scintillation response in quantum dots (QDs) by Létant and Wang in 2006 [ 33 ], several other emerging materials platforms, low-dimensional platforms, have been proposed and evaluated including metal halide perovskites [ 34 ], [ 35 ], all inorganic perovskites [ 36 ], organic–inorganic layered perovskites, scintillating nanotubes [ 37 ], [ 38 ], lanthanide-doped nanoparticles [ 7 ], [ 10 ], and metal–organic frameworks [ 39 ], [ 40 ]. In addition to rare-earth doped nanoscintillators, various types of oxides [ 41 ], [ 42 ], halides [ 43 ], sulfides [ 44 ], and oxysulfides scintillating nanostructures [ 45 ] with varying refractive index have been designed and evaluated offering a tunable range of scintillation wavelength, morphology, decay lifetime, and radiation hardness. Despite a plethora of advantages including outstanding spectral range tunability and flexibility of design, nanoscintillators can suffer from low quantum yield originating from thermal quenching and large self-absorption compared to their bulk counterparts.…”