2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b04768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanostructured Au(111)/Oxide Epitaxial Heterostructures with Tailoring Plasmonic Response by a One-Step Strategy

Abstract: In this work we present a strategy for developing epitaxial incommensurate nanostructured-Au/oxide heterostructures with tuneable plasmonic response. Previously high quality single phase and oriented α-Fe2O3(0001) thin films were achieved, which have been used as a template for the noble metal epitaxial deposition. The complex systems have been grown by pulsed laser deposition on two different type of oxide substrates: α-Al2O3(0001) and SrTiO3(111). A one-step procedure has been achieved tailoring the isolated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

11
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
11
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be pointed out that some Kiessig fringes around layer Bragg peaks can be noted, indicating the occurrence of high quality and smooth surfaces and abrupt α-Fe2O3/STO substrate and Au/α-Fe2O3 interfaces. These results are in agreement with those previously reported in [28]. Out-of-plane and in-plane lattice parameters were calculated from the positions at several diffraction peaks in reciprocal space respect to the STO(111) substrate obtaining for α-Fe2O3 layers: cα-Fe2O3/STO = 13.72(6) Å, cAu/α-Fe2O3/STO = 13.72(3) Å, aα-Fe2O3 = bα-Fe2O3 = 5.08(4) Å and aAu/α-Fe2O3/STO = bAu/α-Fe2O3/STO =5.07 (1) Å and for Au layer: cAu/α-Fe2O3/STO = 7.04 (2) Å and aAu/α-Fe2O3/STO = bAu/α-Fe2O3/STO = 2.89 (2) Å. Additionally, the in-plane domain sizes were calculated to be around 25 nm for the epitaxial α-Fe2O3 layer and Au/α-Fe2O3 system and around 17 nm for the epitaxial Au, in agreement with a previous work [28].…”
Section: Morphological and Structural Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It should be pointed out that some Kiessig fringes around layer Bragg peaks can be noted, indicating the occurrence of high quality and smooth surfaces and abrupt α-Fe2O3/STO substrate and Au/α-Fe2O3 interfaces. These results are in agreement with those previously reported in [28]. Out-of-plane and in-plane lattice parameters were calculated from the positions at several diffraction peaks in reciprocal space respect to the STO(111) substrate obtaining for α-Fe2O3 layers: cα-Fe2O3/STO = 13.72(6) Å, cAu/α-Fe2O3/STO = 13.72(3) Å, aα-Fe2O3 = bα-Fe2O3 = 5.08(4) Å and aAu/α-Fe2O3/STO = bAu/α-Fe2O3/STO =5.07 (1) Å and for Au layer: cAu/α-Fe2O3/STO = 7.04 (2) Å and aAu/α-Fe2O3/STO = bAu/α-Fe2O3/STO = 2.89 (2) Å. Additionally, the in-plane domain sizes were calculated to be around 25 nm for the epitaxial α-Fe2O3 layer and Au/α-Fe2O3 system and around 17 nm for the epitaxial Au, in agreement with a previous work [28].…”
Section: Morphological and Structural Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This type of growth is induced during the Au growth when keeping the sample substrate at a temperature of 250 ºC, as was identified previously in [28], inducing an island-type growth of Au that is promoted by the surface diffusion. The phenomenon is attributed to a dewetting process by a one-step procedure [26][27][28] instead of the usual methodology based on the post-annealing of the metallic film [22][23][24]29,34]. Specifically, here the α-Fe2O3 surface presents a particulated character with a discontinuous profile which generates a more heterogeneous stress distribution than in a flat surface.…”
Section: Morphological and Structural Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations