2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.01.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanostructured thin films for anti-reflection applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rough surface also needs to be considered as a new layer consisting of a mixture of air and material (film or substrate). For example, Chen and Sun reported anti-reflection effect of nanostructured surface [25]. Effective Medium Approximation (EMA) was used to model the mixture layer of a rough surface and the Bruggeman model of EMA [26] is shown, Equation 9.…”
Section: Of 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rough surface also needs to be considered as a new layer consisting of a mixture of air and material (film or substrate). For example, Chen and Sun reported anti-reflection effect of nanostructured surface [25]. Effective Medium Approximation (EMA) was used to model the mixture layer of a rough surface and the Bruggeman model of EMA [26] is shown, Equation 9.…”
Section: Of 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micro-or nanostructuring for light-trapping and antireflect coatings has been studied during the last decade in order to increase solar cell and photovoltaic (PV) module efficiency. A large part of these works is dedicated to decrease reflection at the multiple interfaces of the PV module: most of these structures involve submicrometric patterns, such as diffraction gratings [1][2][3][4][5]. Other structures have been placed under the solar cell in order to reflect the light passing through the cell [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inhomogeneous antireflection coatings can provide greater flexibility in effective refractive indices but often require the use of challenging nanofabrication processes. These have included top-down approaches such as selfmasked dry etching [7], wet etching [8][9][10][11], electron beam lithography [12], interference lithography [13,14], and rollto-roll nanoimprinting [15]; and bottom-up approaches, such as anodic alumina oxide nanoporous films [16,17], nanosphere lithography (NSL) [18], and carbon nanotubes [19]. In nearly all cases, minimizing surface reflectivity for normally incident light has been emphasized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%