2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.05.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanostructuring of p- and n-type skutterudites reaching figures of merit of approximately 1.3 and 1.6, respectively

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
80
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
8
80
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The improved performance of some multiply filled skutterudites 8,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] may be explained in part from nanodomains with avoided crossings at different qvectors. However, in many cases the concentrations of some filler atom are low and in that case defect scattering should also play an important role.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improved performance of some multiply filled skutterudites 8,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] may be explained in part from nanodomains with avoided crossings at different qvectors. However, in many cases the concentrations of some filler atom are low and in that case defect scattering should also play an important role.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our Yb-filled samples show excellent TE performance with a maximum ZT of 1.5 at 850 K for Yb 0.3 Co 4 Sb 12 (nominal composition), outperforming all previously reported single-element-filled skutterudites, 12,15,17,[26][27][28][29] and having comparable performance to the best reported values for any n-type skutterudites. 5,8,30 For power generation applications, the average ZT in the temperature range of use is more important to achieve high TE conversion efficiency. 3, 31 We therefore compared the average ZTs of Yb 0.3 Co 4 Sb 12 with those of the best reported ZT of triple-filled CoSb 3 , 5 as shown in Figure 3b.…”
Section: Te Transport Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Skutterudite antimonide is one of the most promising candidates for intermediate temperature TE power generation (500-900 K) owing to the availability of both high-performance n-and p-type compositions within this material class with excellent thermomechanical properties and relatively low-cost and abundant constituent elements (compared with the state-of-the-art Bi 2 Te 3 and PbTe). [4][5][6][7][8][9] Guest filling in the structural nanovoids to form the so-called filled skutterudites (i.e., R y (Co,Fe) 4 Sb 12 , where R represents the filler and y the filling fraction) is the best strategy for enhancing the TE figure of merit ZT as the fillers both act to control carrier concentration and significantly suppress the propagation of heat-carrying phonons. 6,7 Many elements can be partially filled in CoSb 3 , such as alkali, alkaline earth, rare earth, and group IIIA elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, thermoelectric materials have shown great advances in the figure of merit (ZT), especially for intermediate-temperature (600~1000 K) thermoelectric materials, through nano-structured material, band structure engineering, and grain boundary engineering. Skutterudite, a well-known intermediate-temperature thermoelectric material, shows a relatively high ZT of 1.6 at 800 K for n-type case, and 1.3 at 775 K for p-type case by nano-structuring [1]. PbTe also shows peak ZT of 2.5 at 923 K, and average ZT 1.67 between 300 and 900 K which is due largely to its band structure engineering and nano-structuring [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%