2013
DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2012.667013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narrative Comprehension Skills in 5-Year-Old Children: Correlational Analysis and Comprehender Profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
3
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
31
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The Gates–MacGinitie Listening Comprehension subtest requires students to select pictures that best depict parts of a story read by the examiner. Possibly more variance would have been explained with an individually administered narrative comprehension measure that tapped deeper vocabulary and syntactic knowledge (see Potocki & Ecalle, 2013). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gates–MacGinitie Listening Comprehension subtest requires students to select pictures that best depict parts of a story read by the examiner. Possibly more variance would have been explained with an individually administered narrative comprehension measure that tapped deeper vocabulary and syntactic knowledge (see Potocki & Ecalle, 2013). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It includes the construction of a coherent representation of the situation described in a text by understanding both the explicit statements of the text and integrating this with general world knowledge stored in memory (for a review, see Kintsch, ). Authors therefore make a distinction between the two main types of processes involved in the understanding of a text, namely literal and inferential comprehension processes (e.g., Potocki, Ecalle, & Magnan, ). The latter are essential for the understanding of a text.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central executive system of working memory. An experimental n-back task was used to assess the central executive system of working memory (Potocki, Ecalle & Magnan, 2013). The children had to decide whether a picture presented on a screen (at a rate of one picture every 2 seconds) was identical to the picture presented one or two steps previously.…”
Section: Measures In Kindergartenmentioning
confidence: 99%