Questions of Cinema 1981
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-16579-7_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narrative Space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In doing this they centre and re-centre the human body for our view, thus presenting us with a mirroring sense of our own bodily centrality and coherence. 60 It is this American system which has defined ways of representing character subjectivity in a 'universal', almost hegemonic sense in world cinema, and it is the absence of this which Kobita Sarkar appeared to regret in the commercial film. In fact, these codes are not absent, but they are unsystematically deployed and are often combined with the other modes of visual representation I have described.…”
Section: Modes Of Representationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In doing this they centre and re-centre the human body for our view, thus presenting us with a mirroring sense of our own bodily centrality and coherence. 60 It is this American system which has defined ways of representing character subjectivity in a 'universal', almost hegemonic sense in world cinema, and it is the absence of this which Kobita Sarkar appeared to regret in the commercial film. In fact, these codes are not absent, but they are unsystematically deployed and are often combined with the other modes of visual representation I have described.…”
Section: Modes Of Representationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To the purpose of this analysis, it is important to highlight how an emphasis on the haptic nature of the cinematographic experience challenged understandings of cinematic space as proposed, for instance, by Pascal Bonitzer (1985), Jean-Louis Comolli (1971-72) and Stephen Heath (1976), which, much in tune with the tradition of a semiotic and psychoanalytic-inspired film theory, saw the flat surface of the film screen as comparable to the illusory threedimensionality of painting (Bonitzer 1985). As Philip Rosen explains, theorists such as Comolli and Heath "made claims for the dominance of Renaissance perspective in image technology," connecting this persistence "to the appeal of a 'centred' subject-position, whose geometrical construction in perspective they understood through certain kinds of historical materialism and psychoanalysis" (Rosen 2001, 14).…”
Section: Cinema Painting Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is far from accidental, therefore, that the actuality footage in The City of the Future should be presented as a series of point‐of‐view shots, attributed to the perspective of the film's time‐travelling protagonist. This construction of a coherent sense of narrative space (Heath 1981), absent from the original animated photographs The City of the Future reworks, serves on a structural level to negate the film's radical intent.…”
Section: Robinson In Timementioning
confidence: 99%