2015
DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2015.1077926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narrowing the “digital divide”—facilitating access to computer technology to enhance the lives of those with aphasia: a feasibility study

Abstract: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence Newcastle University ePrints-eprint.ncl.ac.uk Kelly H, Kennedy F, Britton H, McGuire G, Law J. Narrowing the "digital divide"-facilitating access to computer technology to enhance the lives of those with aphasia: a feasibility study. Aphasiology 2016, 30(2-3), 133-163.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is proposed that similar training in communication support may be of benefit to aged care staff and other health professionals to facilitate consumer involvement in shared decision‐making and care planning across the health and aged care sectors. This proposal is consistent with past exploration of the perspectives of community‐dwelling adults living with a communication impairment about their interactions with healthcare providers (Kelly, Kennedy, Britton, McGuire, & Law, ; Lezzoni, O’Day, Kileen, & Harker, ; Nordehn, Meredith, & Bye, ; Tomkins, Siyambalapitiya, & Worrall, ). Similar to participants in this study, community‐dwelling adults who experience communication impairment have expressed a desire to be treated with respect and as a person of intellect who is explicitly supported to take an active role in their health care (Lezzoni et al, ; Nordehn et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is proposed that similar training in communication support may be of benefit to aged care staff and other health professionals to facilitate consumer involvement in shared decision‐making and care planning across the health and aged care sectors. This proposal is consistent with past exploration of the perspectives of community‐dwelling adults living with a communication impairment about their interactions with healthcare providers (Kelly, Kennedy, Britton, McGuire, & Law, ; Lezzoni, O’Day, Kileen, & Harker, ; Nordehn, Meredith, & Bye, ; Tomkins, Siyambalapitiya, & Worrall, ). Similar to participants in this study, community‐dwelling adults who experience communication impairment have expressed a desire to be treated with respect and as a person of intellect who is explicitly supported to take an active role in their health care (Lezzoni et al, ; Nordehn et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…To improve communication with healthcare providers, participants in these studies emphasised the need for healthcare providers to receive additional training in communication support to enable them to respond to the needs of consumers who use a range of communication means. Furthermore, the participants called for healthcare providers to take increased responsibility in supporting consumers with communication impairment, rather than relying on the consumer to accommodate their own communication needs (Kelly et al, ; Lezzoni et al, ; Nordehn et al, ; Tomkins et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Involving patients and families in shaping health services has potential benefits in terms of improving quality of care and health outcomes (Prior & Campbell, 2018). Communication is central to human existence and participation, so living with a chronic communication impairment has far‐reaching negative effects on health‐related quality of life, self‐identity, mental health, social networks and relationships, return to work, social and community participation, stigmatisation, disadvantage, access to digital technology and ‘third‐party disability’ for family members (FMs) (Baker, Worrall, Rose, & Ryan, 2019; Black‐Schaffer & Osberg, 1990; Grawburg, Howe, Worrall, & Scarinci, 2013; Hersh, 2017; Hilari, Needle, & Harrison, 2012; Kelly, Kennedy, Britton, McGuire, & Law, 2016; Morris, Franklin, & Menger, 2011; Northcott, Marshall, & Hilari, 2016; Northcott, Moss, Harrison, & Hilari, 2016; Parr, 1997; Shadden, 2005). Advocates have shifted focus to providing holistic support targeting personally meaningful outcomes and removal of barriers to participation in society more generally, for example using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework (WHO, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies reported how patients favour the use of screen‐reader applications (e.g., the iPad's Speak Selection) or computer‐generated text‐to‐speech technology to access independently text they are interested in when using the device (Kelly et al . 2016, Knollman‐Porter and Julian 2019, Knollman‐Porter et al . 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%