2003
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00718.2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nasal contribution to breathing with exercise: effect of race and gender

Abstract: Because the nose acts as a filter to prevent penetration of toxic particles and gases to the lower respiratory tract, the route of breathing, oral vs. nasal, may be an important determinant of toxicant dose to the lungs. Using respiratory inductance plethysmography and a nasal mask fitted with flowmeter, we measured the nasal contribution to breathing at rest and during exercise (to 60% maximum workload) in healthy young adults (men/women = 11/11 and Caucasian/African-American = 11/11). We found that the nasal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Individuals with CMB show changes in the muscular, circulatory, and respiratory systems, and such changes can affect the physiological response to exercise. (24) Some studies have assessed cardiorespiratory function in subjects under conditions that induce mouth breathing. (25)(26)(27)(28) Ribeiro & Soares (25) observed that some spirometric indices (FEF 25-75% and maximal voluntary ventilation) were below and decreased cervical lordosis in 30 mouthbreathing children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals with CMB show changes in the muscular, circulatory, and respiratory systems, and such changes can affect the physiological response to exercise. (24) Some studies have assessed cardiorespiratory function in subjects under conditions that induce mouth breathing. (25)(26)(27)(28) Ribeiro & Soares (25) observed that some spirometric indices (FEF 25-75% and maximal voluntary ventilation) were below and decreased cervical lordosis in 30 mouthbreathing children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total dose conversion factor (DCF) for combined style of breathing can be calculated with the assumption of 60% mouth and 40% nasal breathing [17]:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A maximum oral-to-nasal airflow ratio from 30 to 67% was observed at ventilation levels from 38 to 65 L/min. The differences between subjects should be included, as the change of each airway resistance from nearly equal during wakefulness to twice as large as the oral resistance during sleeping (supine position) Fitzpatrick et al (2003) or racial differences, Bennett et al (2003) may be important.…”
Section: Steadymentioning
confidence: 99%