1999
DOI: 10.1111/1467-937x.00076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nash Equilibrium and Welfare Optimality

Abstract: If A is a set of social alternatives, a social choice rule (SCR) assigns a subset of A to each potential profile of individuals’ preferences over A, where the subset is interpreted as the set of “welfare optima”. A game form (or “mechanism”) implements the social choice rule if, for any potential profile of preferences, (i) any welfare optimum can arise as a Nash equilibrium of the game form (implying, in particular, that a Nash equilibrium exists) and, (ii) all Nash equilibria are welfare optimal. The main re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
755
2
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 923 publications
(770 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
8
755
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, if we look for positive st st results, we have to allow for state-dependent utility functions. The condition of Maskin Monotonicity (Maskin, 1977) is necessary and, under our assumptions, sufficient for Nash implementability with three or more agents. As Maskin himself notes the well-known strict Spence-Mirrlees single-crossing property is a sufficient condition for Maskin monotonicity to be satisfied.…”
Section: F(s) 5 F(t) ; St [mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Secondly, if we look for positive st st results, we have to allow for state-dependent utility functions. The condition of Maskin Monotonicity (Maskin, 1977) is necessary and, under our assumptions, sufficient for Nash implementability with three or more agents. As Maskin himself notes the well-known strict Spence-Mirrlees single-crossing property is a sufficient condition for Maskin monotonicity to be satisfied.…”
Section: F(s) 5 F(t) ; St [mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In principle, since parties are symmetrically informed about the firm's reorganization value, the contract could include a revelation game (Maskin 1999) of the following sort. The parties separately report the state of nature.…”
Section: The Case With One Creditormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, remember that the Walrasian correspondence is implementable in Nash equilibrium over a class of economies in which Walrasian allocations are always interior. We feel legitimate to make the game stops at stage 1 if allocations are in the interior of the feasible set 11 . If, given a price p 2 P , an interior allocation is not Walrasian, at least one agent would like to obtain a di¤erent feasible bundle at that price.…”
Section: Taking Care Of the Boundary Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maskin monotonicity (Maskin (1999)) is a necessary condition for implementation of social choice correspondences in Nash Equilibrium. This condition has been shown to be restrictive in some cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%