2007
DOI: 10.2209/tdcpublication.48.187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nasolabial Flap Reconstruction of Floor of Mouth

Abstract: We treated two patients requiring nasolabial flap reconstruction. The first patient was a 75-year-old man with mucoepidermoid carcinoma in the left-side floor of the mouth; requiring resection of the floor of the mouth, partial mandibulectomy, and left supraomohyoid neck dissection.The second patient was a 74-year-old man with recurrent acinic cell carcinoma in the anterior oral floor infiltrating as far as the mandible. This patient required wide excision of the anterior part of the oral cavity, including amp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the bulkiness of the inferiorly based nasolabial flap may be a disadvantage and may cause some difficulties in wearing dentures [7]. Although the nasolabial flap has been initially used for reconstruction for nasal and facial skin defects [4,5] there is nowadays well documented evidence that this flap can be ideally used for reconstruction of smaller defects in the oral cavity [10-22]. The reported defect size ranged from small defects (2-4 cm) to moderate defects (4-6 cm) [3,7,9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the bulkiness of the inferiorly based nasolabial flap may be a disadvantage and may cause some difficulties in wearing dentures [7]. Although the nasolabial flap has been initially used for reconstruction for nasal and facial skin defects [4,5] there is nowadays well documented evidence that this flap can be ideally used for reconstruction of smaller defects in the oral cavity [10-22]. The reported defect size ranged from small defects (2-4 cm) to moderate defects (4-6 cm) [3,7,9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With an overall flap loss rate of 7% in our patient group, our results are in the range of other published flap loss rates. Even in cases who had undergone neck dissection with simultaneous dissection of a nasolabial flap on the same side, no adverse effects on blood supply of the flap were observed [7,22]. This in fact corresponds to the assumption that not only the facial artery supplies the flap, but probably a rich subdermal plexus [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high vascularity of the flap enables a uni or bilateral ganglion dissection with facial artery ligation without having a detri-mental effect on the viability of the flap ( 13 - 15 ). Most patients, in line with our treatment protocols, underwent elective neck dissection without it having a negative effect on the flap.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes nasolabial flaps ideal for reconstruction of small intraoral defects. The nasolabial flap is a very simple flap used for reconstruction of intraoral defects in the floor of the mouth [2,3], the tongue, cheek, commissures [4], nose tip, nasal ala, and lower eyelids [5]. The nasolabial flap may be superiorly or inferiorly based.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%