1998
DOI: 10.1097/00132586-199812000-00055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nasotracheal Intubation in the Presence of Frontobasal Skull Fracture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14,[20][21][22][23] The transnasal route is chosen, because patients better tolerate the transnasal passage of the tube after decongestion and topical anesthesia of the nasal mucosa (we use 0.5 mL of a 10% cocaine hydrochloride solution) compared with the transoral route. 24 Epistaxis and fractures of the skull base need not to be contraindications, 25,26 as long as the endoscope and the tube are inserted and advanced under visual control and not in a blind way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,[20][21][22][23] The transnasal route is chosen, because patients better tolerate the transnasal passage of the tube after decongestion and topical anesthesia of the nasal mucosa (we use 0.5 mL of a 10% cocaine hydrochloride solution) compared with the transoral route. 24 Epistaxis and fractures of the skull base need not to be contraindications, 25,26 as long as the endoscope and the tube are inserted and advanced under visual control and not in a blind way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%