2019
DOI: 10.1002/smj.3046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nation‐dyadic history and cross‐border corporate deals: Role of conflict, trade, generational distance, and professional education

Abstract: Research Summary This paper explores why and how nation‐dyadic history impacts aggregated firm decisions involving cross‐border activities (acquisitions, joint ventures, and alliances). We contextualize history and illustrate the negative effect of historical conflict on cross‐border deals. Nation‐dyads with historical conflict incorporate negative sentiments into their social and collective memories and national identities. Members of society assume the socially constructed national identity via primary and s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(114 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, we found that it was important to acknowledge the key role of the leadership transition in China in the early 2010s and its attendant policy changes, which led to significant shifts in the strategies followed not only by Chinese MNEs, but also other firms as they reacted to changes in the competitive landscape. As our findings revealed a complex pattern of competition and cooperation between developing country and developed country MNEs, more research is needed to understand the firm‐level implications of increasingly complex—and in some cases, conflictual—relationships between these nations (Arikan, Arikan, & Shenkar, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For instance, we found that it was important to acknowledge the key role of the leadership transition in China in the early 2010s and its attendant policy changes, which led to significant shifts in the strategies followed not only by Chinese MNEs, but also other firms as they reacted to changes in the competitive landscape. As our findings revealed a complex pattern of competition and cooperation between developing country and developed country MNEs, more research is needed to understand the firm‐level implications of increasingly complex—and in some cases, conflictual—relationships between these nations (Arikan, Arikan, & Shenkar, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Hence, one can label someone’s age as young, adolescent, or old, but much information is lost in categorization as a substitute for the actual number. IB research needs to acknowledge that countries do not have to transition into Western capitalism and that every nation is on a different evolutionary path and has a trajectory for growth (Arikan, Arikan, & Shenkar, 2020 ). IB research is interested in bilateral and multilateral interactions between nations that are on different evolutionary paths and growth trajectories; we should not allow parsimony to exceed its usefulness threshold and become an obstacle to such observation and analysis.…”
Section: Neglected Audiences and Actorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such generalizations unnecessarily oversimplify complex systems with many variables across societies. In any society, multiple generations of individuals have been educated, conditioned, and socialized to conform to specific norms (Arikan et al, 2020 ). Societies have collective memories, but people’s interpretations of historical events will vary across societies even though people share many aspects of the same culture.…”
Section: Neglected Audiences and Actorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, de Melo and Robinson (1990) develop a model of such a process and find that export externalities, in a computable general equilibrium model calibrated to the typical developing country experiencing export-led growth, that policies that support export externalities yield significant growth effects. 4 The potential gains from liberalization strategy and the successful nurturing of infant industries by selective protection and subsequent export policies must be qualified in one important dimension. If developing countries as a group open up, there is every reason to believe that their terms of trade will be adversely affected.…”
Section: What Remains Of the Case For Protection?mentioning
confidence: 99%