Nation, Nationality, and National Identity: Uses, Misuses, and the Hungarian Case of External Ethnic Citizenship

Abstract

The article looks at the changing terrain of inclusion and exclusion, through mapping the shifts in Hungarian citizenship law and its political context. More specifically, it deals with the legal aspects of the definitional exercise of belonging to the Hungarian nation, starting with an analysis of the relevant provisions of the 2011 Fundamental Law of Hungary and moving on to assess the phenomenon of external ethnic citizenship. The surrounding political and legal debates are read together with insights from normative scholarship to trace the changing meaning of who belongs to the nation, in what sense and with what practical consequences. The paper discusses the political context of the changing constitutional and citizenship rules to demonstrate the circularity in defining the nation: who gets to vote will have an impact on who decides on who gets to vote which in turn will have an impact on who gets to vote, how, and for how long. The article concludes that supplanting the political nation with the ethno-cultural concept means that overinclusion has given way to underinclusion. For instance, some who used to be defined as part of the ethno-cultural nation have come to be viewed as voluntary outsiders: with the availability of non-residential naturalization, those who opted not to acquire Hungarian citizens can now be seen as also falling outside the nation, rewriting basic tenets of national identity.

Citizenship without identity? Instrumentalism, nationalism and naturalization in Chinese men's football

“…As Körtvélyesi (2020: 778) stated, the fundamental question of who belongs to a political community continues to make waves throughout the world, and, normally, nationality and citizenship are the two terms used to describe a person's membership status in relation to a nation-state. Laws on citizenship derive from two basic principles: jus sanguine (blood ties) and jus soli (territorial birthright) (Brubaker, 1990).…”

Hungarian Language and Law: Developing a Grammar for Social Inclusion, a Vocabulary for Political Emancipation. Special Issue (IJSL)—Editorial Preface

“…Since the failed referendum on dual citizenship, every aspect of ethnicity as a cultural feature has come again and again under the spotlight. The extension of Hungarian citizenship to those who claim to be Hungarian in the ethnic sense (and who speak Hungarian, too), but who do not have a permanent address on the territory of Hungary, is discussed in detail by an excellent paper in this special issue, written by Zsolt Körtvélyesi [21].…”

People, Sovereignty and Citizenship: The Ethnonational Populists’ Constitutional Vocabulary

“…The document enshrines an ethnic vision of the 'we the people' concept because it is not the people in a constitutionalist sense but those belonging to the 'Hungarian nation' who are the sovereigns. 17…”