2006
DOI: 10.3133/ofr20061219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National Assessment of Shoreline Change Part 3: Historical Shoreline Change and Associated Coastal Land Loss Along Sandy Shorelines of the California Coast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
112
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
112
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…At the time this shoreline was extracted, the uncertainty was estimated by considering two sources of error: Global Positioning System (GPS) position error, which was estimated to be ±1 m, and regression errors, which were estimated to be ±1.5 m (Hapke et al, 2006). These two terms were added in quadrature to get a bulk estimate of an uncertainty of 1.8 m.…”
Section: Contour Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the time this shoreline was extracted, the uncertainty was estimated by considering two sources of error: Global Positioning System (GPS) position error, which was estimated to be ±1 m, and regression errors, which were estimated to be ±1.5 m (Hapke et al, 2006). These two terms were added in quadrature to get a bulk estimate of an uncertainty of 1.8 m.…”
Section: Contour Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El error de georreferenciación (E g ) se deriva del error de la raíz cuadrada media (RMS) obtenido durante la corrección geométrica de las imágenes, mientras que el error de digitalización (E d ) se estimó a partir de valores de otros estudios referenciados por Moore (2000). Siguiendo la metodología descrita por Hapke et al (2006), el error total en la posición de las líneas de costa (E lc ) se calculó mediante la raíz cuadrada de la suma de los cuadrados de los errores (Ecuación 1).…”
Section: Cálculo De Tasas De Erosión Y Acreción Litoralunclassified
“…4), sitespecific, uniform values for Er 0 and C can be set using longterm field observations of cliff retreat (e.g. Hapke and Reid, 2007). Although the model does not explicitly model the smaller-scale structural variations that affect the retreat rate of the rock, such as joints and fractures (Clark and Johnson, 1995;Trenhaile et al, 1998;Dickson et al, 2004), the longterm cliff retreat rate allows for implicit representation (e.g.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%