1992
DOI: 10.1080/09537329208524086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National capacities to absorb and institutionalize external science and technology

Abstract: This article describes a conceptual model of kechnology absorption and adaptation leading to a cozintly's export-based conipetitiveness i n high-technology products, and the results of the mwiel's application to empirical data on 29 countries. The model is one output of a rec(?nily-completed, jive-year investigation of indicators of hightechnology development. The model's sezren conceptual variables were operationalized by combining statistical data with expert-derived measures to produce composite indicators.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main differences between outsourcing/offshoring and related offset can be explained by the fundamental purpose of related offset, which often is to enhance long-term economic development in the buying country (Ahlström, 2000). One proven way to promote economic development is through technological development of the sub-supplier (Sharif, 1986;Roessner et al, 1992); therefore, it is important within related offsets to create job opportunities through, for example, transfer of production. Furthermore, new or advanced technology is often requested, since the buyer wants to assimilate new knowledge into the domestic economy, where it can diffuse and stimulate growth (Stephen, 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main differences between outsourcing/offshoring and related offset can be explained by the fundamental purpose of related offset, which often is to enhance long-term economic development in the buying country (Ahlström, 2000). One proven way to promote economic development is through technological development of the sub-supplier (Sharif, 1986;Roessner et al, 1992); therefore, it is important within related offsets to create job opportunities through, for example, transfer of production. Furthermore, new or advanced technology is often requested, since the buyer wants to assimilate new knowledge into the domestic economy, where it can diffuse and stimulate growth (Stephen, 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in focus between transfers within related offset businesses and other types of transfers can be explained by the fundamental purposes of offset businesses, to enhance long-term economic development in the buying country (Ahlström, 2000). A way to raise economic development is through technological development (Sharif, 1986;Roessner et al, 1992); subsequently the transfer can be a facilitator or even a prerequisite when economic development is desired (Steenhuis and Bruijn, 2001). Viera et al (2014) confirm the relevance of Saab's business case with Brazil by concluding that international technology transfer has become an important part of Brazil's business strategy.…”
Section: Capability and Capability Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samli and Kosenko (1982) suggest including a market support service system in the transfer package. Indeed, research has shown China's ability to assimilate and to make effective utilization of technological knowledge has been rated as rather low, even among developing countries (Roessner, Porter & Xu, 1992).…”
Section: Dependism Dynamicmentioning
confidence: 99%