2018
DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2018.23.37.1700795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa associated with an aftercare solution following piercings, July to September 2016, England

Abstract: We report a national Pseudomonas aeruginosa outbreak from a common source following piercings between July and September 2016 in England. The multi-agency outbreak investigation included active case finding, microbiological testing of environmental samples and case specimens including Variable Number Tandem Repeat (VNTR) typing and a retrospective cohort study. Overall, 162 outbreak cases (29 confirmed, 14 probable and 119 possible) and 14 non-outbreak cases were identified; all confirmed cases had ear piercin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cases of P. aeruginosa infections associated with the use of cosmetics rarely appear in the literature. The most severe case described in the literature concerned the national outbreak of P. aeruginosa associated with an aftercare solution following piercings in England . Also, corneal ulcers developed after the usage of Pseudomonas ‐contaminated mascara were identified in Egypt…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cases of P. aeruginosa infections associated with the use of cosmetics rarely appear in the literature. The most severe case described in the literature concerned the national outbreak of P. aeruginosa associated with an aftercare solution following piercings in England . Also, corneal ulcers developed after the usage of Pseudomonas ‐contaminated mascara were identified in Egypt…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most severe case described in the literature concerned the national outbreak of P. aeruginosa associated with an aftercare solution following piercings in England. 28 Also, corneal ulcers developed after the usage of Pseudomonas-contaminated mascara were identified in Egypt. 29 The second most commonly identified species of Gramnegative bacteria in cosmetics was Enterobacter gergoviae.…”
Section: Main Findings Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 In addition, as it is a polymerase chain reaction-based method, results can be generated rapidly and are portable between laboratories, making it preferable to PFGE, which is more laborious and not easily comparable between laboratories. Of the nine loci chosen for this scheme, the ninth is particularly discriminatory and may be used to evaluate relatedness between isolates from hospital outbreaks and in other settings among non-CF patients, [33][34][35][36] but this locus is not always useful for CF isolate discrimination, as variation in copy number may be found in different colonies from the same sputum sample.…”
Section: Use Of Variable Number Tandem Repeat In a Reference Laboratory Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example is the tracking of Pseudomonas infections to a cleaning solution marketed for ear piercings; WGS of the organisms in infected individuals proved conclusively that they had been infected by organisms within a barrel used to produce the cleaning solution. This enabled rapid tracking, successful removal of the inadequately manufactured product, and in fact, prosecution (Evans et al., 2018).…”
Section: Infectious Disease Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%