National Trends in Ambulatory Surgery for Upper Extremity Fractures: A 10-Year Analysis of the US National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery

Abstract

Background Upper extremity fractures are increasing in frequency and have profound socioeconomic implications. The purpose of this study was to assess trends in ambulatory upper extremity fracture fixation in the USA from 1996 to 2006 using data from the National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery (NSAS). Methods The NSAS was used to identify cases of closed forearm, carpal, metacarpal, and phalanx fractures treated with open or closed reduction with internal fixation in 1996 and 2006. Data were analyzed for trends in fracture location, age, gender, facility type, payor status, and anesthesia type. US census data were used to obtain national population estimates. Results Over the 10-year study period, there was a 54.4 % increase in the population-adjusted rate of upper extremity fractures treated with internal fixation (34.6 to 53.4 per 100,000 capita). There was a 173 % increase in the ageadjusted rate of patients over 55 years treated with internal fixation. There was a 505 % increase in the number of cases performed at freestanding surgical centers compared to hospital-based facilities. Though the majority of cases involved general anesthesia, regional anesthesia (16.6 versus 20.6 %) and monitored anesthesia care (7.1 versus 11.8 %) increased in frequency. Private insurance groups funded the majority of surgeries in both study years. Conclusion The volume of ambulatory surgery for upper extremity fractures has increased dramatically from 1996 to 2006. Operative treatment of upper extremity fractures has increased markedly. Our analysis provides valuable information for providers and policy-makers for allocating the appropriate resources to help sustain this volume.

Humeral shaft fractures: national trends in management

“…This was an independent association on multivariate regression analysis and therefore not simply driven by Medicare patients being statistically older than privately insured patients. This finding is similar to a previous analysis that identified an association between surgery for upper extremity fracture and private insurance [ 29 ]. Additionally, previous analysis of supracondylar humerus fractures treated as outpatients in the pediatric population found that privately insured patients were nearly two and a half times as likely to return for surgical intervention than those with public or no insurance [ 30 ].…”

Epidemiology of distal radius fractures and factors predicting risk and prognosis

“…98 Bone quality is an important factor to consider because the number of adults with DRF treated operatively, including older adults, appears to be rising. 2,99 Analysis of a bone density database including all people assessed in Manitoba, Canada revealed that wrist fractures are associated with a rate of subsequent fractures, which is significantly higher than those without prior fractures (14.2% vs 10.8%). 100 However, the risk elevation is small (about 3.5%) and lower than for those with prior osteoporotic fracture at spine (25.7%), hip (24.9%), or humerus (23.7%).…”

Trends in the Use of Regional Anesthesia

“…An increasing trend in utilization of PNBs has also been suggested in previous reports. [11][12][13] Our data demonstrate significant differences in the use of NA and PNBs by race, as the black population showed the lowest rate of utilization compared with all other groups. Moreover, overall differences in the distribution of regional anesthetic techniques among populations have been reported from the National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry data of the Anesthesia Quality Institute.…”