Background Upper extremity fractures are increasing in frequency and have profound socioeconomic implications. The purpose of this study was to assess trends in ambulatory upper extremity fracture fixation in the USA from 1996 to 2006 using data from the National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery (NSAS). Methods The NSAS was used to identify cases of closed forearm, carpal, metacarpal, and phalanx fractures treated with open or closed reduction with internal fixation in 1996 and 2006. Data were analyzed for trends in fracture location, age, gender, facility type, payor status, and anesthesia type. US census data were used to obtain national population estimates. Results Over the 10-year study period, there was a 54.4 % increase in the population-adjusted rate of upper extremity fractures treated with internal fixation (34.6 to 53.4 per 100,000 capita). There was a 173 % increase in the ageadjusted rate of patients over 55 years treated with internal fixation. There was a 505 % increase in the number of cases performed at freestanding surgical centers compared to hospital-based facilities. Though the majority of cases involved general anesthesia, regional anesthesia (16.6 versus 20.6 %) and monitored anesthesia care (7.1 versus 11.8 %) increased in frequency. Private insurance groups funded the majority of surgeries in both study years. Conclusion The volume of ambulatory surgery for upper extremity fractures has increased dramatically from 1996 to 2006. Operative treatment of upper extremity fractures has increased markedly. Our analysis provides valuable information for providers and policy-makers for allocating the appropriate resources to help sustain this volume.
Monohydrate and anhydrate crystalline forms of the DNA
nucleobase
cytosine interconvert via a topotactic solid-state mechanism where
water functions as a molecular switch. The solid-state dehydration
mechanism and kinetics were elucidated using complementary time-resolved
synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction and thermogravimetric methods.
Results indicate the reaction initiates from the crystal surface,
involves no other crystalline intermediates, and proceeds at rates
that depend on the monohydrate processing. A molecular-level model,
based on least-motion arguments and consistent with the totality of
the experimental data, is proposed to account for the high degree
of structure transfer associated with the transformation. Water loss
on the monohydrate crystal surface activates the rotation of one-dimensional
cytosine ribbons, which in turn alters the local environment of the
neighboring unit cell, facilitating the release of additional water
molecules and ribbon rotation. As the dehydration front progresses
into the solid, this cooperative mechanism effectively converts two-dimensional
layers of antiparallel π-offset stacked ribbons into orthogonal
two-dimensional layers of parallel π-face–face stacked
ribbons. Moisture sorption experiments performed under high-humidity
conditions confirm the anhydrate product can be reversibly rehydrated
back to the monohydrate and that repeated dehydration–rehydration
cycles proceed at consistent rates. The ability to track both the
structural and compositional changes in the sample throughout the
course of the reaction makes this a powerful combination of techniques
for characterizing cooperative rotational motions triggered by water
loss and/or uptake from crystalline materials.
Natural disasters are often described as having antagonistic qualities (e.g., wildfires ravage). The information deficit model presumes that when people assess the risk of weather hazards, they ignore irrelevant metaphoric descriptors. However, metaphoric frames affect reasoning. The current research assessed whether antagonist metaphors for natural disasters affect perceptions of the risk they pose. Three studies ( N = 1,936) demonstrated that participants forecasted an antagonist-framed natural hazard as being more severe, and intended to evacuate more often, than a literal-framed natural hazard. Thus, the metaphorical language used to discuss natural disasters deserves consideration in the development of effective risk communication.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.