2000
DOI: 10.2307/2653974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nationalism and Modernism: A Critical Survey of Recent Theories of Nations and Nationalism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ethno‐national group rights are thereby explored in their multiple dimensions differentiating between proper group or community rights, group‐differentiated rights (Kymlicka, 1995), communal rights and individual rights with a collective dimension (Donders, 2016). This fruitful discussion meets with an equally rich literature that conceptualises the nature of the nation and nationality on a wide spectrum from essentialism to constructivism (e.g., Coakley, 2012; Özkırımlı, 2000; Smith, 1999). Although the division between subjectivists and objectivists is still alive today, this paper aims to uncouple the firmly paired notions: objective and other‐classification versus subjective and self‐classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Ethno‐national group rights are thereby explored in their multiple dimensions differentiating between proper group or community rights, group‐differentiated rights (Kymlicka, 1995), communal rights and individual rights with a collective dimension (Donders, 2016). This fruitful discussion meets with an equally rich literature that conceptualises the nature of the nation and nationality on a wide spectrum from essentialism to constructivism (e.g., Coakley, 2012; Özkırımlı, 2000; Smith, 1999). Although the division between subjectivists and objectivists is still alive today, this paper aims to uncouple the firmly paired notions: objective and other‐classification versus subjective and self‐classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The two countries represent, respectively, the largest socialist-communism and democracy in the region. Vietnam's economy has grown exponentially since it joined the World Trade Organization in 2007 (Sakata, 2013) but the freedom to opine and respect for human rights remain minimal (Freedom House, 2020). Indonesia is the biggest market in the region and has been the champion of democracy since the fall of President Soeharto in 1998.…”
Section: The Pandemic and Ctas In Indonesia And Vietnammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One answer stems from the new literature on nationalism "from below" that attempts to answer the question of how ordinary people, manifesting different political and social orientations, consume the national symbols offered by elites and intellectuals-while also producing their own (Deloye 2013). For Smith (1998), ethnosymbols of nationhood act as a Durkheimian "social fact," a cultural independent variable that shapes society and politics. Ethnosymbols are reproduced by vernacular or state institutions over generations, which attach people affectively to the nation.…”
Section: How Political Beliefs Shape National Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%