2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2487-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Native American gene flow into Polynesia predating Easter Island settlement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to analyze results, data were divided by grouping the individuals according to their community or region of origin. As described in Ioannidis et al 74 , we assessed the probability that an individual selected at random from population A shares an IBD track greater than 7 cM (in order to avoid spurious matches) with an individual selected at random from population B. Therefore, we divided the total number of individual pairs connected by more than 7 cM of IBD by the total number of possible individual pairs, for each pair of indigenous groups analyzed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to analyze results, data were divided by grouping the individuals according to their community or region of origin. As described in Ioannidis et al 74 , we assessed the probability that an individual selected at random from population A shares an IBD track greater than 7 cM (in order to avoid spurious matches) with an individual selected at random from population B. Therefore, we divided the total number of individual pairs connected by more than 7 cM of IBD by the total number of possible individual pairs, for each pair of indigenous groups analyzed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To control for the effect of admixture on the effective population sizes of CAHG, we then used RFMix to estimate local ancestry proportions along the genome in order to conduct ancestry-specific IBD analysis in those CAHG populations showing evidence of admixture (>10% median Bantu-associated ancestry according to the output of ADMIXTURE) (85)(Table S9). Following Perry et al (65) and Ioannidis et al (86), reference panels for each population were created selected unadmixed Bantu individuals (with >98% Bantu ancestry) according to the output from ADMIXTURE K=2. These were then paired with each CAHG population and ADMIXTURE was rerun on each pair to select appropriate reference panels for each specific case.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inferring recent genetic connectivity between CAHG Although IBD sharing within populations provides insights into population size changes, IBD sharing between populations provides insights into recent contact or recent common ancestry. Since CAHG have a deep divergence (1), shared IBD blocks can be used to infer recent contact (37,38,86). We analyzed IBD blocks in three categories: 1-5, 5-10, and >10 cM.…”
Section: Validation Of the Model Using Archaeological Assemblagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this study only included archaeological remains from northern North America and South America, and no Mesoamerican records were considered. Moreover, a recent study proposed a putative contact between Central Americans and Oceanian populations (~1200 CE) using modern DNA and some ancient individuals across the Americas (including the Saki Tzul individuals from the Maya Mountains) [ 90 ]. Integrating additional ancient genomes through time and space in Mesoamerica could help to clarify these hypotheses.…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%