2019
DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00088-19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Native and Invading Yellow Starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) Microbiomes Differ in Composition and Diversity of Bacteria

Abstract: Invasive species could benefit from being introduced to locations with more favorable species interactions, including the loss of enemies, the gain of mutualists, or the simplification of complex interaction networks. Microbiomes are an important source of species interactions with strong fitness effects on multicellular organisms, and these interactions are known to vary across regions. The highly invasive plant yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) has been shown to experience more favorable microbial … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(180 reference statements)
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the NMDS plots showed that there was a clear separation between the pot experiment and field invaded site, indicating that rhizosphere microbial community was largely influenced by environmental conditions (Figure 1C). The dominant prokaryotic phyla found in the control and rhizosphere community included Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, Planctomycetes, and Chloroflexi (Figure 1D), which was consistent with previous studies (Lu-Irving et al, 2019). The community differences between the control soil and rhizospheres of M. micrantha and native plants were also explored.…”
Section: Microbial Structure Of the Rhizosphere Microbiomesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Moreover, the NMDS plots showed that there was a clear separation between the pot experiment and field invaded site, indicating that rhizosphere microbial community was largely influenced by environmental conditions (Figure 1C). The dominant prokaryotic phyla found in the control and rhizosphere community included Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, Planctomycetes, and Chloroflexi (Figure 1D), which was consistent with previous studies (Lu-Irving et al, 2019). The community differences between the control soil and rhizospheres of M. micrantha and native plants were also explored.…”
Section: Microbial Structure Of the Rhizosphere Microbiomesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Also, we examined whether differences in the microbiome occur during the invasion process and whether they are more pronounced along different river sections (downstream versus upstream; a proxy for the effect of microhabitat characteristics) or between crayfish populations of different density and species composition (core versus front; a proxy for the effect of changing population characteristics along the invasion range, that is, nonrandom dispersal and density-dependent effects). As effects of both resident and invader microbiota are increasingly recognized among the drivers of invasion success ( 35 , 36 ), our results offer a baseline for better understanding their role and dynamics during range expansion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Interestingly, the few studies we encountered that surveyed endophytic microbiomes of invasive plants in both their native and invaded ranges found that endophyte assemblages differed between ranges. For instance, Lu‐Irving and colleagues () report reduced richness in phyllosphere and endophytic root bacteria in the invaded portion of the range of Centaurea solstitialis compared with the native range. Similarly, Shipunov and colleagues () report a wholesale shift in the fungal endophyte assemblage within the leaves of Centaurea stoebe in invaded versus native portions of its range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%