2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Native species recovery after reduction of an invasive tree by biological control with and without active removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…), which was present between 3% and 15% as cover in plots outside the Tamarix canopy, plant species were undesirable weedy species such as Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson), S. elaeagnifolium, and S. tragus. Compared with the increase in native plants noted by Sher et al (2018), the overall lack of positive response by understory plants at our site is likely because the dry site is not hydraulically connected to the Rio Grande or Caballo Reservoir (currently at a historical low level) and did not experience any inundation during the entire experiment. A comprehensive study by González et al (2017) indicated that native vegetation recovery is dependent on restoration of fluvial processes.…”
Section: Change In Vegetation Compositionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…), which was present between 3% and 15% as cover in plots outside the Tamarix canopy, plant species were undesirable weedy species such as Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson), S. elaeagnifolium, and S. tragus. Compared with the increase in native plants noted by Sher et al (2018), the overall lack of positive response by understory plants at our site is likely because the dry site is not hydraulically connected to the Rio Grande or Caballo Reservoir (currently at a historical low level) and did not experience any inundation during the entire experiment. A comprehensive study by González et al (2017) indicated that native vegetation recovery is dependent on restoration of fluvial processes.…”
Section: Change In Vegetation Compositionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Furthermore, the lack of treatment difference is not surprising given the time required for plant communities to respond to vegetation treatments. For example, Sher et al (2018) demonstrated that after Tamarix removal, native plants increased by year 2 and exotic plant cover did not increase until year 4. There was a change in plant species presence and abundance from pretreatment in spring 2016 (dry season) to ∼15 mo posttreatment in August 2017 (monsoon season), but this was based on precipitation, not treatment.…”
Section: Change In Vegetation Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several techniques for the control and removal of invasive species that can be applied on a case-by-case basis, and there is a demand among restoration practitioners for a decision support tool to choose the best plant control methods (Sher et al, 2018). Management of invasive alien plants may or may not involve a combination of mechanical, chemical and biological control methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies of hurricane effects on invasive plants have utilized examples where biological control is absent [3,16]. However, the use of biological control, using natural enemies to target and control invading plant species, is now integrated with several integrated plant management strategies [2,22,27]. In general, herbicidal and biological control methods are different in the sense that the former method usually requires repeated treatment of the invasive plants [1,8,13] while the latter is generally capable of being self-sustained on the targeted invasive plant species and may require only a single treatment [30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%