2017
DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyx384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural and Artificial Intelligence in Neurosurgery: A Systematic Review

Abstract: We conclude that ML models have the potential to augment the decision-making capacity of clinicians in neurosurgical applications; however, significant hurdles remain associated with creating, validating, and deploying ML models in the clinical setting. Shifting from the preconceptions of a human-vs-machine to a human-and-machine paradigm could be essential to overcome these hurdles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
144
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
144
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…First, although there were some reported neurosurgical applications of ML, most of them used ML for analyzing radiological data, such as MRI images [49]. This is the first study to use ML for the prediction of TSS outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, although there were some reported neurosurgical applications of ML, most of them used ML for analyzing radiological data, such as MRI images [49]. This is the first study to use ML for the prediction of TSS outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial intelligence techniques are being rapidly deployed in neuroradiology and radiomics [1,2], many of which may benefit from new image markers to describe and characterize regions of interest (ROI), quite apart from new computerized parameters which could quantify specific features in an objective way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many brain tumor patients undergoing neurosurgery face significant uncertainty regarding the outcome of surgery. Although average neurosurgical outcomes for patient cohorts can be predicted with a high degree of accuracy (Emblem et al, 2009(Emblem et al, , 2015Senders et al, 2017), the heterogeneity of brain tumors complicates predictions on an individual patient level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%