“…Thus, ultrasound can be considered a good alternative for improving the extraction of anthocyanins because of increased mass transfer rates and the possibility of rupturing of the cell wall during the cavitation process, which can lead to greater extraction (Bonfigli et al, 2017;Fernandes et al, 2020;López et al, 2018;Porto;Porretto;Decorti, 2013;Shirsath;Sonawane;Gogate, 2012). UAE is considered a promising technique as it offers many advantages: simple manipulation (Jin et al, 2019), low cost of equipment (Carrera et al, 2012), higher extraction yield efficiency in terms of time and solvent consumption (Adjé et al, 2010;Ivanovic et al, 2014), reduced energy and water consumption (Pinela et al, 2019), and use in low temperatures that can avoid thermal damage to extracts; thus, minimizing the loss of bioactive compounds (Bonfigli, et al, 2017;Corbin et al, 2015). The efficiency of this technique is affected by the process variables of temperature and ultrasonic power (Pinela et al, 2019), and therefore, optimizing these variables is important.…”