2016
DOI: 10.3390/foods5030058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural Chemical Composition of Commercial Fish Species: Characterisation of Pangasius, Wild and Farmed Turbot and Barramundi

Abstract: To comply with the relevant legal requirements and correct labelling, it is necessary for business operators and inspection authorities to know the natural characteristics of the raw material. This study gives a comprehensive overview of muscle flesh composition of farmed and wild Atlantic turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) and barramundi (Lates calcarifer) and of farmed pangasius (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus). The proximate composition, di- and triphosphates and citric acid values are presented in order to evaluat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
3
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
15
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On contrast to our findings and earlier reports mentioned above, Baki, Gönener, and Kaya (), Manthey‐Karl et al () and Jiang et al () reported higher levels of EAAs in farmed seabass ( Dicentrarchus labrax ), turbot ( Scophthalmus maximus ) and red tail ( Chanodichthys mongolicus ), respectively, versus wild‐caught individuals. Manthey‐Karl et al () investigated different fish species from various regions and culture conditions such as Spain, Chile and Vietnam with comparison of farmed versus wild fish. The authors reported variations in amino acid pattern among turbot cultured in different countries (Spain and Chile) and those captured from the Atlantic Ocean.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…On contrast to our findings and earlier reports mentioned above, Baki, Gönener, and Kaya (), Manthey‐Karl et al () and Jiang et al () reported higher levels of EAAs in farmed seabass ( Dicentrarchus labrax ), turbot ( Scophthalmus maximus ) and red tail ( Chanodichthys mongolicus ), respectively, versus wild‐caught individuals. Manthey‐Karl et al () investigated different fish species from various regions and culture conditions such as Spain, Chile and Vietnam with comparison of farmed versus wild fish. The authors reported variations in amino acid pattern among turbot cultured in different countries (Spain and Chile) and those captured from the Atlantic Ocean.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings in the present study in terms of higher total essential amino acids (∑EAA) and lower total non‐essential amino acids (∑NEAA) in wild axillary seabream versus farmed or farm‐aggregated fish are in agreement with earlier reports in meagre ( Argyrosomus regius , Saavedra et al, ), ussuri catfish ( Pseudobagrus ussuriensis , Wang et al, ), beluga sturgeon ( Huso huso , Hamzeh et al, ), barramundi ( Lates calcarifer , Manthey‐Karl, Lehmann, Ostermeyer, & Schröder, ). On contrast to our findings and earlier reports mentioned above, Baki, Gönener, and Kaya (), Manthey‐Karl et al () and Jiang et al () reported higher levels of EAAs in farmed seabass ( Dicentrarchus labrax ), turbot ( Scophthalmus maximus ) and red tail ( Chanodichthys mongolicus ), respectively, versus wild‐caught individuals. Manthey‐Karl et al () investigated different fish species from various regions and culture conditions such as Spain, Chile and Vietnam with comparison of farmed versus wild fish.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In aquaculture, excess fat deposition in the muscle has been mainly attributed to environmental and/or nutritional factors that promote lipid retention, such as temperature (Cordier et al, 2002;Ibarz et al, 2007;Moreira et al, 2008), unbalanced FA profiles in fish feed (Izquierdo et al, 2003), and starch (Alvarez et al, 1999;Castro et al, 2015b;Dias et al, 1998;Lanari et al, 1999;Messina et al, 2013), respectively. As the edible fraction of the fish, this tissue is also under permanent scrutiny by the consumer who associates visible fat depots with fish of "inferior" quality, especially if compared with wild fish (Grigorakis, 2007;Manthey-Karl et al, 2016;Vidal et al, 2012). Excess fat deposition around the viscera decreases yields for producers and appeal for consumers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%