1971
DOI: 10.3109/00016357109026337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural Head Position in Standing Subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
176
2
35

Year Published

1974
1974
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 387 publications
(219 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
6
176
2
35
Order By: Relevance
“…The range of ICC values (0.96-0.98) showed high intra-examiner consistency and were in accordance with results of other studies [7]. According to some authors gender could have an effect on cranio-cervical postural measures [18] and for this reason preliminary analysis of the data using an unpaired t test was undertaken to assess the possible effect of gender on the cranio-cervical postural measures. For each participant results of the paired t test were then used to compare mean changes in head and neck postural alignment between the two sets of radiographs taken in the SUP at the end of quiet expiration and then in the ST registration.…”
Section: Statistical Analysessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The range of ICC values (0.96-0.98) showed high intra-examiner consistency and were in accordance with results of other studies [7]. According to some authors gender could have an effect on cranio-cervical postural measures [18] and for this reason preliminary analysis of the data using an unpaired t test was undertaken to assess the possible effect of gender on the cranio-cervical postural measures. For each participant results of the paired t test were then used to compare mean changes in head and neck postural alignment between the two sets of radiographs taken in the SUP at the end of quiet expiration and then in the ST registration.…”
Section: Statistical Analysessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…By defining the reference positions as those obtained during standardised postures, this error will appear as imprecision and not inaccuracy. In a study of the natural head position in standing subjects, Solow and Tallgren [28] found a reproducibility of 1.4° for head flexion/extension, and similar values have been reported in another study [35]. Hence, the contribution of the method per se to the overall exposure variability can, for head flexion/extension, be estimated by the (square root of) the sum of variances caused by …”
Section: Accuracy and Precision Of The Methodssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Patients sat wearing a hair band, with centric occlusion, reposed lips, and natural head position. 13 OptoTOP-SE (Breuckmann, Meersburg, Germany; white-light scanner; 30-40 mm accuracy according to the manufacturer, scanning time ,3 seconds) was used by a single operator. The 3D-FSIs were reconstructed using Rapidform 2006 and Rapidform XO scanning software (Inus Technology Inc, Seoul, Korea).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Cephalometric tracing and measurements were performed by a single operator using the V-Ceph program (Osstem, Seoul, Korea).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%