2004
DOI: 10.1007/s10658-004-2493-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural infections of tomato by Citrus exocortis viroid, Columnea latent viroid, Potato spindle tuber viroid and Tomato chlorotic dwarf viroid

Abstract: Since 1988, viroids have been occasionally detected in samples of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) originating both in the Netherlands and other countries. Infected plants showed chlorosis, bronzing, leaf distortion and growth reduction. Initial diagnosis of these viroids was by return-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, which did not allow a further identification. This paper reports the identification of these viroids by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and sequence analysis. Three known viroi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
133
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
133
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…JQ975098). Following notification to the Norwegian Food Safety Authority, the finding was confirmed in a new sample that tested positive using the conventional RT-PCR method (Verhoeven et al,2004), at Bioforsk. The disease spread from three to four plants in December 2011 to several hundred by the end of January 2012.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…JQ975098). Following notification to the Norwegian Food Safety Authority, the finding was confirmed in a new sample that tested positive using the conventional RT-PCR method (Verhoeven et al,2004), at Bioforsk. The disease spread from three to four plants in December 2011 to several hundred by the end of January 2012.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…2009;Nixon at al., 2009) Verhoeven et al (2004). This suggests that the viroid infection originated from the host plants' place of origin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 'semi-specific' PSTVd-h ⁄ c primers (Shamloul et al, 1997), the universal Vir 1 ⁄ 2 (Mumford et al, 2000) and the Vid-FW ⁄ RE (Verhoeven et al, 2004) primer sets were used. All tests gave negative results, even with the last primer sets, initially designed to detect CLVd isolates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%