2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural killer cell detection, quantification, and subpopulation identification on paper microfluidic cell chromatography using smartphone-based machine learning classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experiment, 1% blood sample had better linearity than DI water. This pattern has often been seen in previous studies as well 48 , 49 . In a study that detected ROR1 + cancer cells in buffy coat blood samples, the linearity of aggregation did not increase with cell concentration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our experiment, 1% blood sample had better linearity than DI water. This pattern has often been seen in previous studies as well 48 , 49 . In a study that detected ROR1 + cancer cells in buffy coat blood samples, the linearity of aggregation did not increase with cell concentration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In the first set of experiments, we tested two monoclonal antibodies targeting B. burgdorferi recombinant OspA in a simple fluid of DI water and a complex biological fluid of blood, diluted to 1%. For this class of assay, whole blood is traditionally diluted to 10% and/or 1%, because whole blood viscosity prevents flow in microfluidics 48 , 49 . In our experiment, 1% blood sample had better linearity than DI water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection of cytokines in biological samples requires the use of analytical methods characterized by high sensitivity and specificity, taking into account the very low levels of these biomarkers and the complex matrix in which they are found. 66,67 Conventional detection methods were developed starting from the immunological methods such as enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), 67,68 hyphenated chromatographic methods combining high-performance liquid chromatography with diverse detection methods: mass spectrometry (MS), UV-VIS spectrophotometry, and electrochemical methods, 69 as well as several spectrophotometric techniques 70 and DNA-based methods. 69 The special requirements for analytical parameters that are suitable for the detection of these biomarkers have led researchers to look for alternative methods.…”
Section: Analytical Methods Applied For Cytokines Determination In Bi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrarily, a paper-based microfluidic device for cell chromatography was utilized to analyze the proportion of CD56 bright and CD56 dim NK-92 cells. 270 The cells flowed through the paper-based device containing anti-CD56 fluorescent nanoparticles, and heterogeneous NK cells could be distinguished based on size differences because IL-2-starved CD56 dim NK-92 cells were smaller than CD56 bright ones. Consequently, CD56 bright NK-92 cells were trapped near the inlet of the device owing to increased flow resistance.…”
Section: Future Of Adoptive Cell Immunotherapy Through Microfluidic S...mentioning
confidence: 99%