“…This advantage has been broadly used to generate LAIV by introducing specific amino acid substitutions, or deletions, in the viral genome (Martinez-Sobrido et al, 2018;Rodriguez et al, 2018b;Blanco-Lobo et al, 2019;Hilimire et al, 2020). For instance, IAV encoding truncated versions of NS1 or where the NS1 sequence was completely removed (DNS1) have been generated and used as potential LAIV candidates in multiple animal species (Quinlivan et al, 2005;Solorzano et al, 2005;Richt et al, 2006;Vincent et al, 2007;Wang et al, 2008;Chambers et al, 2009;Steel et al, 2009;Kappes et al, 2012;Choi et al, 2015;Jang et al, 2016;Na et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2017;Nogales et al, 2017b;Jang et al, 2018;Nicolodi et al, 2019;Lee et al, 2021;Vandoorn et al, 2022a), or to study IAV infections (Nogales et al, 2021a), including the contribution of NS1, and its domains, in viral pathogenesis (Nogales et al, 2017a;Nogales et al, 2017c;Chauche et al, 2018;Nogales et al, 2018a;Nogales et al, 2018b;Nogales et al, 2021b). Because NS1 is the main countermeasure against cellular antiviral responses, the recovery of NS1 truncated or deficient viruses can be challenging, since these viruses have limited ability to inhibit the cellular innate immune responses induced during viral infection Kochs et al, 2007;Hale et al, 2008;Nogales et al, 2018b;Nogales et al, 2019b).…”